MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.tjog.2022.06.016

Медицинская библиотека · Taiwanese journal of obstetrics & gynecology · 2023

Comparison of cesarean delivery outcome after robotic and laparoscopic myomectomy.

Won Seyeon, Choi Su Hyeon, Kim Su Jin, Lee Nara, Shim So Hyun, Kim Miseon, Kim Mi Kyoung, Jung Yong Wook, Yun Bo Seong, Seong Seok Ju, Kim Mi-La

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to determine whether robotic myomectomy (RM) resulted in any measurable clinical improvement over laparoscopic myomectomy (LM) in subsequent cesarean delivery.

MATERIALS AND

METHODS

The medical records of 273 patients who had undergone LM or RM followed by subsequent cesarean delivery for the period of September 2015 to December 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. The patients were divided into LM (n = 222) and RM (n = 51) groups. The cesarean delivery outcomes between the two groups were compared.

RESULTS

RM had significantly more myomas removed (6.0 ± 4.8 vs. 3.6 ± 3.5, p < 0.001) and a larger size of largest myoma (7.7 ± 2.4 vs. 6.1 ± 2.4, p = 0.002) at myomectomy compared with LM. However, there were no significant differences in the groups' surgical characteristics at cesarean section, in their pregnancy complications, or in adhesion formation.

CONCLUSIONS

Although more and larger myomas were removed in the RM group, RM showed similar cesarean delivery outcomes and adhesion formation to LM.

Для цитирования: Won Seyeon, Choi Su Hyeon, Kim Su Jin, Lee Nara, Shim So Hyun, Kim Miseon, Kim Mi Kyoung, Jung Yong Wook, Yun Bo Seong, Seong Seok Ju, Kim Mi-La. Comparison of cesarean delivery outcome after robotic and laparoscopic myomectomy.. Taiwanese journal of obstetrics & gynecology. 2023. DOI: 10.1016/j.tjog.2022.06.016.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.