Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2023
Quantitative MRI in distinguishing bladder paraganglioma from bladder leiomyoma.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Hu Xiaoxiao, Wang Ke, Sun Mengya, Li Chang, Wang Huanjun, Guan Jian
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To investigate the feasibility of quantitative MRI in the differentiation of bladder paraganglioma from bladder leiomyoma.
METHODS: From 2014 to 2021, 11 patients with bladder paraganglioma and 14 patients with bladder leiomyoma confirmed by surgical pathology were retrospectively collected. All patients underwent multiparametric scanning with a 3.0 T MR system. Quantitative parameters including the SI-ratio on T1WI between the solid component of tumours and piriformis, ADC value and E-rate of the solid component of tumours were assessed. Independent sample t test or Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare these parameters between the two groups. The diagnostic efficiency of the parameters was examined using ROC curve analysis and the DeLong test.
RESULTS: There were significant differences in SI-ratio on T1WI (P < 0.001), ADC value (P = 0.002) and the E-rate (P = 0.040) between the paraganglioma group and the leiomyoma group. The cutoff value of SI-ratio on 3 leiomyoma was 1.241, and the AUC was 1.000 (0.858-1.000). The cutoff value of the ADC value was 0.979 × 10-3mm2/s, and the AUC was 0.907 (0.717-0.987). The cutoff value of E-rate was 98.7%, and the AUC was 0.714 (0.495-0.878). The AUCs of the SI-ratio on T1WI and ADC value were significantly higher than the E-rate AUC (P = 0.015 and 0.034, respectively).
CONCLUSION: Quantitative MRI can effectively distinguish bladder paraganglioma from bladder leiomyoma with the SI-ratio on T1WI or ADC value.
METHODS: From 2014 to 2021, 11 patients with bladder paraganglioma and 14 patients with bladder leiomyoma confirmed by surgical pathology were retrospectively collected. All patients underwent multiparametric scanning with a 3.0 T MR system. Quantitative parameters including the SI-ratio on T1WI between the solid component of tumours and piriformis, ADC value and E-rate of the solid component of tumours were assessed. Independent sample t test or Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare these parameters between the two groups. The diagnostic efficiency of the parameters was examined using ROC curve analysis and the DeLong test.
RESULTS: There were significant differences in SI-ratio on T1WI (P < 0.001), ADC value (P = 0.002) and the E-rate (P = 0.040) between the paraganglioma group and the leiomyoma group. The cutoff value of SI-ratio on 3 leiomyoma was 1.241, and the AUC was 1.000 (0.858-1.000). The cutoff value of the ADC value was 0.979 × 10-3mm2/s, and the AUC was 0.907 (0.717-0.987). The cutoff value of E-rate was 98.7%, and the AUC was 0.714 (0.495-0.878). The AUCs of the SI-ratio on T1WI and ADC value were significantly higher than the E-rate AUC (P = 0.015 and 0.034, respectively).
CONCLUSION: Quantitative MRI can effectively distinguish bladder paraganglioma from bladder leiomyoma with the SI-ratio on T1WI or ADC value.