Physical therapy in sport : official journal of the Association of Chartered Physiotherapists in Sports Medicine · 2025
The Victorian Institute of Sport Assessment - Achilles is fundamentally flawed and unfit for clinical practice or research: A Rasch Measurement Theory Analysis using COSMIN recommendations.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Travers Nigel, Murphy Myles C, Wand Benedict M, Kirwan Paul, Travers Mervyn, Debenham James, Gibson William, Hince Dana
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: Evaluate structural validity, hypothesis testing and measurement invariance of the Victorian Institute of Sport Assessment-Achilles (VISA-A) using Rasch analysis to determine if it can be recommended to measure Achilles tendinopathy severity.
METHODS: We performed an evaluation of the VISA-A measurement properties using Rasch Measurement Theory by pooling individual participant data from previously conducted studies (n = 217). Structural validity was assessed via threshold/category mean order; adequate item fit; unidimensionality; local dependence; internal consistency. Hypothesis testing was assessed via divergent validity. Measurement invariance assessed via differential item functioning.
RESULTS: The VISA-A has inadequate construct validity. This is evident from issues with item 8 and insufficient threshold order, item fit, borderline internal consistency and measurement invariance, with item response being influenced by both age and BMI.
CONCLUSION: The VISA-A has inadequate structural validity, borderline internal consistency and poor measurement invariance. Thus, the VISA-A does not meet with COSMIN criteria for construct validity due to issues with structural validity and measurement invariance. Thus, the VISA-A cannot be recommended for use, and should not be used in clinical practice or research. However, if the VISA-A has been used, analysis using only items 1-6, with responses collapsed into a 4-point scale provides the best structural validity.
METHODS: We performed an evaluation of the VISA-A measurement properties using Rasch Measurement Theory by pooling individual participant data from previously conducted studies (n = 217). Structural validity was assessed via threshold/category mean order; adequate item fit; unidimensionality; local dependence; internal consistency. Hypothesis testing was assessed via divergent validity. Measurement invariance assessed via differential item functioning.
RESULTS: The VISA-A has inadequate construct validity. This is evident from issues with item 8 and insufficient threshold order, item fit, borderline internal consistency and measurement invariance, with item response being influenced by both age and BMI.
CONCLUSION: The VISA-A has inadequate structural validity, borderline internal consistency and poor measurement invariance. Thus, the VISA-A does not meet with COSMIN criteria for construct validity due to issues with structural validity and measurement invariance. Thus, the VISA-A cannot be recommended for use, and should not be used in clinical practice or research. However, if the VISA-A has been used, analysis using only items 1-6, with responses collapsed into a 4-point scale provides the best structural validity.