The journal of obstetrics and gynaecology research · 2020
Is Valsalva maneuver an alternative to use tenaculum for endometrial sampling procedure in cases where the cervix cannot be passed spontaneously with pipelle? A randomized study.
СтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Narin Raziye, Uysal Gülsüm, Baş Sevda, Narin Mehmet A, Küçükbingöz Emine G
Аннотация
AIM: To evaluate the effect of the Valsalva maneuver on ease of the endometrial sampling procedure in cases where the cervix cannot be passed spontaneously.
METHODS: A randomized prospective trial was conducted in 84 patients whose cervix could not pass spontaneously with pipelle, and they were randomized for the Valsalva maneuver or tenaculum groups. In 43 of a total of 84 patients, we requested Valsalva maneuver throughout the process to pass the cervical canal, and in 41 patients, we performed tenaculum to pass the cervix.
RESULTS: Valsalva and tenaculum groups did not differ in success rates (P = 0.314). There was no difference between the two groups in the history of the disease, past surgery and education (P > 0.05).
CONCLUSION: In endometrial sampling procedure with pipelle, when the cervix cannot be passed spontaneously, the transition with the Valsalva maneuver should be tried before using the tenaculum. Thus, a more painful procedure can be avoided and patient satisfaction may increase.
METHODS: A randomized prospective trial was conducted in 84 patients whose cervix could not pass spontaneously with pipelle, and they were randomized for the Valsalva maneuver or tenaculum groups. In 43 of a total of 84 patients, we requested Valsalva maneuver throughout the process to pass the cervical canal, and in 41 patients, we performed tenaculum to pass the cervix.
RESULTS: Valsalva and tenaculum groups did not differ in success rates (P = 0.314). There was no difference between the two groups in the history of the disease, past surgery and education (P > 0.05).
CONCLUSION: In endometrial sampling procedure with pipelle, when the cervix cannot be passed spontaneously, the transition with the Valsalva maneuver should be tried before using the tenaculum. Thus, a more painful procedure can be avoided and patient satisfaction may increase.