Trigeminal reflex testing abnormalities as a predictive model for distinguishing classical and idiopathic trigeminal neuralgia.

OBJECTIVE

Primary trigeminal neuralgia (TN) is a representative neuropathic facial pain condition classified into classical (associated with neurovascular compression), and idiopathic (unknown etiology). Differentiating between classical and idiopathic TN based on clinical and neurophysiological findings remains challenging. In this clinical and neurophysiological study, we aimed to identify predictive clinical and neurophysiological variables that may distinguish between the two types of TN.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed clinical records and neurophysiological data from 114 patients with primary TN (84 classical TN, 30 idiopathic TN). We implemented a logistic regression model to identify predictive variables for classical and idiopathic TN.

RESULTS

The logistic regression model showed that a trigeminal reflex latency asymmetry longer than 0.5 ms between the affected and unaffected sides was predictive of classical TN (p < 0.05). Additionally, combined involvement of the second and third trigeminal divisions was predictive of idiopathic TN (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggesting that latency asymmetry in trigeminal reflexes differentiate between classical and idiopathic TN probably reflects the association of classical TN with neurovascular compression, while idiopathic TN may involve other factors affecting trigeminal nerve fibers.

SIGNIFICANCE: Our results enhance our understanding of pathophysiology of TN and could improve clinical differentiation between its types.