Implant dentistry · 2012
Horizontal and vertical ridge augmentation in localized alveolar deficient sites: a retrospective case series.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Annibali Susanna, Bignozzi Isabella, Sammartino Gilberto, La Monaca Gerardo, Cristalli Maria Paola
Аннотация
PURPOSE: This study reviews the clinical outcomes of ridge augmentations performed via horizontal- or vertical-guided bone regeneration (h-GBR, v-GBR) or edentulous ridge expansion.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The degree of defect correction, the marginal bone level, and the horizontal stability of the augmented bone (five patients) were examined with a new proposed rigid resin survey template.
RESULTS: Thirty ridge defects ranging from 1 to 8 mm were corrected, and 56 implants were positioned. The percentages of alveolar defect correction were 91.85% ± 22.30%, 97.13% ± 4.48%, and 90.42% ± 11.93% for h-GBR, edentulous ridge expansion, and v-GBR, respectively; a limited amount of marginal bone level was reported for all three groups, while a large amount of horizontal bone resorption was detected.
CONCLUSIONS: All surgical techniques considered in this study are predictable procedures, and the proposed survey template measurement system showed to be a reliable method of evaluating horizontal bone stability of the augmented ridges.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The degree of defect correction, the marginal bone level, and the horizontal stability of the augmented bone (five patients) were examined with a new proposed rigid resin survey template.
RESULTS: Thirty ridge defects ranging from 1 to 8 mm were corrected, and 56 implants were positioned. The percentages of alveolar defect correction were 91.85% ± 22.30%, 97.13% ± 4.48%, and 90.42% ± 11.93% for h-GBR, edentulous ridge expansion, and v-GBR, respectively; a limited amount of marginal bone level was reported for all three groups, while a large amount of horizontal bone resorption was detected.
CONCLUSIONS: All surgical techniques considered in this study are predictable procedures, and the proposed survey template measurement system showed to be a reliable method of evaluating horizontal bone stability of the augmented ridges.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Alveolar Bone LossAlveolar Ridge AugmentationAnalysis of VarianceBone RegenerationDental Implantation, EndosseousGuided Tissue Regeneration, PeriodontalHumansMembranes, ArtificialModels, AnatomicModels, DentalOutcome Assessment, Health CarePostoperative ComplicationsRadiographyRetrospective StudiesStatistics, Nonparametric