American heart journal · 1983
Relationship of angiographic and echographic dimensions in chronic left ventricular dilatation.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Boudoulas H, Ruff P D, Fulkerson P K, Lewis R P
Аннотация
Recently discrepancies have been reported between echocardiographic (Echo) % delta D and angiocardiographic (Angio) ejection fraction (EF), particularly in valvular regurgitation. One hundred and twelve patients with varying degrees of LV dilatation were studied in the right anterior oblique position with M-mode Echo. None had localized contraction abnormalities. There were 20 normals, 33 with primary myocardial disease, and 59 with mitral and/or aortic regurgitation. Echo end-diastolic diameter (EDD) and end-systolic diameter (ESD) were consistently smaller than Angio calculated EDD and ESD, and the difference was magnified at larger EDDs (p less than 0.01). The result is a relatively poor correlation of Echo % delta D and Angio EF (r = 0.69), compared to r = 0.98 for Angio % delta D and EF, both from Angio visualization. However, if valvular disease patients are excluded, the correlation improves to 0.82. The mechanisms for these disparities include increased sphericity as the ventricle dilates, and in the case of valvular disease where the EF is better for any degree of dilatation, the echo measurement errors for EDD and ESD are different.