Comparative analysis of gingival wetness at natural teeth and dental implant sites.

BACKGROUND

"Gingival Wetness (GW)," which is the thickness of residual saliva on gingiva, functions as a moisture retainer and a protective barrier for microbial colonization. Whether dental implant (DI) treatment affects GW scores and whether gingival inflammation has the capacity to alter GW remains unknown. Thus, this study was designed to evaluate the potential impact of DI treatment on GW.

METHODS

A total of 118 DIs and natural teeth (NT) sites were comparatively analyzed. Clinical periodontal and periimplant status were determined. Sites were classified into 2 subgroups based on the clinical inflammatory status as inflamed or noninflamed. GW was measured by standardized paper strips and quantified by micromoisture meter.

RESULTS

Gingival index, clinical attachment loss, plaque index, and gingival bleeding time index scores were generally lower at DI sites. Significant differences were seen in clinical attachment loss, plaque index, and gingival bleeding time index in inflamed sites, presenting higher scores for NT. Comparable values were observed for DI and NT regarding GW for all sites. No differences were noticed in GW scores between the noninflamed NT and DI sites and also wheninflamed sites were concerned.

CONCLUSIONS

DI treatment does not seem to result in any apparent reduction in GW. Thus, it can be speculated that similar protective processes may occur at dental implant and NT sites. Furthermore, GW does not seem to depend on the local inflammatory status of the soft tissues.