Journal of pediatric urology · 2011
Transpelvic anastomotic stenting: a good option for diversion after pyeloplasty in children.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Le Tan Son, Le Cong Thang, Le Thanh Hung, Nguyen Thi Dan Tram, Huynh Cao Nhan, Nguyen Thi Truc Linh
Аннотация
PURPOSE: Several options are available to drain the renal pelvis after a dysmembered pyeloplasty. The purpose of our study was to review the results of transrenal pelvic transanastomotic stenting following ureteropelvic junction obstruction pyeloplasty (UPJO).
PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective chart review of 238 patients with UPJO (243 renal units) treated in 2004-2007. The patients were divided into 4 groups (1): renal units with very poor function (<10% uptake) having undergone nephrostomy tube placement, with pyeloplasty performed 1 month later for those with improved renal function, and nephrectomy for those with no improvement (2); pyeloplasty without diversion (3); pyeloplasty diverted with transrenal pelvis transanastomotic stenting (4); pyeloplasties diverted with both stents and Foley catheters; the stents used were 5 Fr or 6 Fr feeding tubes.
RESULTS: Group 1: 13 nephrectomies and 31 pyeloplasties diverted with stents and Foley catheters; 1/31 re-do pyeloplasty. Group 2: 33 pyeloplasties that were performed without diversion or stenting; 2/33 required re-do pyeloplasty. Group 3: 122 pyeloplasties diverted with only stents inserted through renal pelvis with 1 nephrostomy due to urine leakage, 2 prolonged urine leaks that ceased spontaneously, 1 urinary infection, no re-do pyeloplasty needed. Group 4: 44 pyeloplasties that were performed with stents and nephrostomy tubes, 2 delays of removal of Foley catheters, no re-do pyeloplasty needed.
CONCLUSIONS: Transrenal pelvis transanastomotic stenting using a feeding tube is a good option for diverting urine following dysmembered pyeloplasty in children.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective chart review of 238 patients with UPJO (243 renal units) treated in 2004-2007. The patients were divided into 4 groups (1): renal units with very poor function (<10% uptake) having undergone nephrostomy tube placement, with pyeloplasty performed 1 month later for those with improved renal function, and nephrectomy for those with no improvement (2); pyeloplasty without diversion (3); pyeloplasty diverted with transrenal pelvis transanastomotic stenting (4); pyeloplasties diverted with both stents and Foley catheters; the stents used were 5 Fr or 6 Fr feeding tubes.
RESULTS: Group 1: 13 nephrectomies and 31 pyeloplasties diverted with stents and Foley catheters; 1/31 re-do pyeloplasty. Group 2: 33 pyeloplasties that were performed without diversion or stenting; 2/33 required re-do pyeloplasty. Group 3: 122 pyeloplasties diverted with only stents inserted through renal pelvis with 1 nephrostomy due to urine leakage, 2 prolonged urine leaks that ceased spontaneously, 1 urinary infection, no re-do pyeloplasty needed. Group 4: 44 pyeloplasties that were performed with stents and nephrostomy tubes, 2 delays of removal of Foley catheters, no re-do pyeloplasty needed.
CONCLUSIONS: Transrenal pelvis transanastomotic stenting using a feeding tube is a good option for diverting urine following dysmembered pyeloplasty in children.