The Canadian journal of urology · 2009
Novel approach for removal of heavily encrusted ureteral stent.
Клинический случайСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Clark Curtis, Bylund Jason, Paszek Matthew, Lagrange Chad, Pais Vernon M
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES AND BACKGROUND: We describe a novel approach for removal of a retained, heavily encrusted ureteral stent via combined laparoscopic cystolithotomy and pyelolithotomy. Due to noncompliance, our patient with a history of nephrolithiasis returned with large proximal and distal stones 2.5 years after placement of a left ureteral stent.
METHODS: Laparoscopy was performed using three 12 mm ports and two 5 mm ports. The bladder was opened in the midline and the stent divided at the ureteral orifice. The bladder stone (4.7 cm x 4 cm) was placed in a retrieval bag and the cystotomy closed with vicryl suture. The proximal ureter and renal pelvis were dissected free and incised. The stent with 2.3 cm x 1.5 cm stone on the proximal curl was removed. The incision was closed transversely with vicryl suture.
RESULTS: The patient's recovery was uneventful, including drain removal prior to discharge on postoperative day 3. The foley was removed after a negative cystogram 7 days later. Analysis revealed calcium phosphate and struvite stones. Left ureteroscopy 2 months later revealed a widely patent proximal ureter. No complications have been identified.
CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic cystolithotomy with stent division combined with pyelolithotomy can be performed safely and successfully as a single procedure to remove the heavily encrusted ureteral stent.
METHODS: Laparoscopy was performed using three 12 mm ports and two 5 mm ports. The bladder was opened in the midline and the stent divided at the ureteral orifice. The bladder stone (4.7 cm x 4 cm) was placed in a retrieval bag and the cystotomy closed with vicryl suture. The proximal ureter and renal pelvis were dissected free and incised. The stent with 2.3 cm x 1.5 cm stone on the proximal curl was removed. The incision was closed transversely with vicryl suture.
RESULTS: The patient's recovery was uneventful, including drain removal prior to discharge on postoperative day 3. The foley was removed after a negative cystogram 7 days later. Analysis revealed calcium phosphate and struvite stones. Left ureteroscopy 2 months later revealed a widely patent proximal ureter. No complications have been identified.
CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic cystolithotomy with stent division combined with pyelolithotomy can be performed safely and successfully as a single procedure to remove the heavily encrusted ureteral stent.