European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2026
Retroauricular robotic neck dissection: step-by-step technique and feasibility in selected early OCSCC.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Agarwal Mudit, Singh Abhishek, Rai Shreya, Bansal Kshitiz, Singh Pradyumann, Karthik P, Bhardwaj Ronak
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Retroauricular robotic neck dissection is a remote-access approach designed for cervical nodal clearance while concealing the incision. We describe our operative technique and early feasibility in carefully selected patients with early oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma (OCSCC).
METHODS: The surgical workflow-including incision design, flap elevation, robotic docking, level-wise dissection, and reconstructive considerations-is detailed with emphasis on technical pearls and pitfalls. A concise descriptive dataset is presented.
CONCLUSION: Retroauricular robotic neck dissection is technically feasible in selected patients when meticulous technique and appropriate case selection are applied. Outcomes should be interpreted as feasibility signals rather than comparative evidence.
METHODS: The surgical workflow-including incision design, flap elevation, robotic docking, level-wise dissection, and reconstructive considerations-is detailed with emphasis on technical pearls and pitfalls. A concise descriptive dataset is presented.
CONCLUSION: Retroauricular robotic neck dissection is technically feasible in selected patients when meticulous technique and appropriate case selection are applied. Outcomes should be interpreted as feasibility signals rather than comparative evidence.