Clinical neurology and neurosurgery · 2020
Dynamic changes in longitudinal stretching of the spinal cord in thoracic spine: Focus on the spinal cord occupation rate of dural sac.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Machino Masaaki, Morita Daigo, Ando Kei, Kobayashi Kazuyoshi, Nakashima Hiroaki, Kanbara Shunsuke, Ito Sadayuki, Inoue Taro, Koshimizu Hiroyuki, Ito Keigo, Kato Fumihiko, Imagama Shiro
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to evaluate the anteroposterior diameters and cross-sectional areas of the dural sac and spinal cord in the thoracic spine, to elucidate the spinal cord occupation rate of the dural sac in these dynamic changes for each level using multidetector-row computed tomography (MDCT).
PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fifty patients with cervical or lumbar spinal disease were prospectively enrolled. After preoperative myelography, MDCT was performed at maximum passive flexion and extension. The anteroposterior diameter and cross-sectional area of the dural sac and spinal cord in the axial plane and the thoracic spinal cord length in the sagittal plane were measured. The spinal cord occupation rate in the dural sac was calculated.
RESULTS: The spinal cord occupation rate of the dural sac in anteroposterior diameter was lower on flexion than on extension, with significant differences from the T1/T2 to T11/T12 levels (p < 0.0001). The spinal cord occupation rate of the dural sac in cross-sectional area was lower on flexion than on extension, with significant differences except from T3/T4 to T6/T7 levels (p < 0.01). There was a bimodal increase in the occupation rate with elevations at the cervicothoracic junction and thoracolumbar junction. The thoracic spinal cord length on flexion was significantly longer than that on extension (p < 0.0001).
CONCLUSIONS: The spinal cord occupation rate of the dural sac was lower on flexion than on extension, despite thoracic spine being considered a rigid region. The dynamic changes in longitudinal stretching and shrinkage of the spinal cord affected the occupation rate.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fifty patients with cervical or lumbar spinal disease were prospectively enrolled. After preoperative myelography, MDCT was performed at maximum passive flexion and extension. The anteroposterior diameter and cross-sectional area of the dural sac and spinal cord in the axial plane and the thoracic spinal cord length in the sagittal plane were measured. The spinal cord occupation rate in the dural sac was calculated.
RESULTS: The spinal cord occupation rate of the dural sac in anteroposterior diameter was lower on flexion than on extension, with significant differences from the T1/T2 to T11/T12 levels (p < 0.0001). The spinal cord occupation rate of the dural sac in cross-sectional area was lower on flexion than on extension, with significant differences except from T3/T4 to T6/T7 levels (p < 0.01). There was a bimodal increase in the occupation rate with elevations at the cervicothoracic junction and thoracolumbar junction. The thoracic spinal cord length on flexion was significantly longer than that on extension (p < 0.0001).
CONCLUSIONS: The spinal cord occupation rate of the dural sac was lower on flexion than on extension, despite thoracic spine being considered a rigid region. The dynamic changes in longitudinal stretching and shrinkage of the spinal cord affected the occupation rate.