The utility of high-frequency jet ventilation in pulsed field ablation for atrial fibrillation.

BACKGROUND

Using high-frequency jet ventilation (HFJV) to improve catheter stability with conventional energy sources during atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation is associated with higher ablation success and improved arrhythmic outcomes. The utility of HFJV with pulsed field ablation (PFA) for AF is unclear. We investigated the utility of HFJV vs. standard ventilation in PFA for AF.

METHODS

We studied consecutive cases of patients with AF undergoing PFA between 5/6/24 to 10/10/24. Procedural data collected included total procedure time and major periprocedural complications. Clinical data collected included atrial tachyarrhythmia (ATA) recurrence, stroke, and major bleeding at one-year follow-up. Outcomes were compared in cases where HFJV was used vs. standard ventilation.

RESULTS

A total of 512 patients were included in this study (307 standard ventilation, 205 HFJV). There was no difference in ATA recurrence by Kaplan-Meier survival analysis between standard ventilation and HFJV groups (log rank test p = 0.59). When comparing standard ventilation vs. HFJV groups, there was no difference in ATA recurrence at one year (23% vs. 26%; p = 0.43), AF burden on continuous monitoring (9 ± 5% vs. 8 ± 24%; p = 0.85), total procedure time (114 ± 38 vs. 115 ± 33 min; p = 0.78), or major periprocedural complications (3% vs. 2%; p = 0.64). There was no difference in arrhythmic outcomes when patients were stratified by AF type and whether patients presented for first-time or redo ablation.

CONCLUSION

Using HFJV in PFA for AF produces similar sinus rhythm maintenance overall and when stratified by AF type without affecting procedure times or complication rate.