Internal medicine journal · 2022
Unbound vitamin D concentrations are not decreased in critically ill patients.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Palmer David, Soule Steven, Gaddam Ravinder R, Elder Peter, Chambers Stephen, Doogue Matthew
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Free concentrations of highly protein bound hormones, such as cortisol and thyroxine, are unchanged in critical illness despite substantial decreases in total concentration. Total 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D) concentration is decreased in critical illness, but the free concentration of 25(OH)D has had less attention.
AIM: To compare total and calculated free 25(OH)D concentrations in critically ill patients with healthy controls.
METHODS: In this case-control study, 38 patients with critical illness were compared with 68 healthy controls; 25(OH)D was measured by liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LCMS/MS) and vitamin D binding protein (VDBP) by direct sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Total and calculated free 25(OH)D concentrations were compared using unpaired t-tests.
RESULTS: Total 25(OH)D concentrations were significantly lower in critically ill patients than controls (37 (95% confidence interval 31-43) vs 57 (53-60) nmol/L). Calculated free concentrations of 25(OH)D were not lower in critically ill patients than healthy controls (26 (22-29) vs 19 (18-20) pmol/L).
CONCLUSIONS: Calculated free 25(OH)D concentrations are not decreased in critical illness. Measuring total 25(OH)D concentrations in patients with critical illness potentially underestimates vitamin D and overestimates the number of patients who are deficient in vitamin D.
AIM: To compare total and calculated free 25(OH)D concentrations in critically ill patients with healthy controls.
METHODS: In this case-control study, 38 patients with critical illness were compared with 68 healthy controls; 25(OH)D was measured by liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LCMS/MS) and vitamin D binding protein (VDBP) by direct sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Total and calculated free 25(OH)D concentrations were compared using unpaired t-tests.
RESULTS: Total 25(OH)D concentrations were significantly lower in critically ill patients than controls (37 (95% confidence interval 31-43) vs 57 (53-60) nmol/L). Calculated free concentrations of 25(OH)D were not lower in critically ill patients than healthy controls (26 (22-29) vs 19 (18-20) pmol/L).
CONCLUSIONS: Calculated free 25(OH)D concentrations are not decreased in critical illness. Measuring total 25(OH)D concentrations in patients with critical illness potentially underestimates vitamin D and overestimates the number of patients who are deficient in vitamin D.