Frontiers in psychology · 2026
Authoritarianism today-a revised measurement model.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Dilling Marius, Heller Ayline, Schließler Clara, Kiess Johannes, Brähler Elmar, Decker Oliver
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: In light of recent social developments, debates about the adequacy of Altemeyer's widely-used scale on "right-wing authoritarianism" have (re-)gained momentum, as a shift in the articulation and expression of authoritarianism could be observed. In the German-speaking realm, researchers argue for a reconsideration of the original conceptualization of authoritarianism, drawing on a developmental-psychological model and a social-theoretical basis in the tradition of Critical Theory. Making this debate accessible to an international readership, we propose a measurement model that conceptualizes authoritarianism as a third-order factor comprising two distinct authoritarian psychodynamics - sadomasochism and fetishism - as second-order factors.
METHODS: After deriving these factors theoretically, we test the proposed model by means of confirmatory factor analysis on a German representative dataset (N = 2,466).
RESULTS: The proposed model fits the data very well (scaled CFI = 0.965, scaled RMSEA = 0.058, scaled SRMR = 0.044) with significant loadings throughout, though it cannot be statistically distinguished from two equivalent specifications and shows limited reliability at the higher-order level (ωl2 = 0.67).
DISCUSSION: By critically reconsidering the origins of authoritarianism and systematically operationalizing and testing our theoretical claims, the paper sheds light on the concept's evolving manifestations and contributes to a nuanced understanding of authoritarian tendencies amidst emerging societal changes.
METHODS: After deriving these factors theoretically, we test the proposed model by means of confirmatory factor analysis on a German representative dataset (N = 2,466).
RESULTS: The proposed model fits the data very well (scaled CFI = 0.965, scaled RMSEA = 0.058, scaled SRMR = 0.044) with significant loadings throughout, though it cannot be statistically distinguished from two equivalent specifications and shows limited reliability at the higher-order level (ωl2 = 0.67).
DISCUSSION: By critically reconsidering the origins of authoritarianism and systematically operationalizing and testing our theoretical claims, the paper sheds light on the concept's evolving manifestations and contributes to a nuanced understanding of authoritarian tendencies amidst emerging societal changes.