European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology · 2024
Prenatal chromosomal microarray analysis and karyotyping in fetuses with isolated choroid plexus cyst: A retrospective case-control study.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Wang Linlin, Liang Ping, Pan Pingshan, Su Jiasun, Qin Jiayi, Chen Zhaoxia, Huang Dongbing, Sun Weijia, Song Pengshu, Wei Hongwei
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the the diagnostic yield of chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) in fetuses with isolated CPC (iCPC).
METHODS: A total of 315 fetuses with iCPC (iCPC group) and 364 fetuses without abnormal ultrasound findings (control group) were recruited between July 2014 to March 2018.
RESULTS: The overall diagnostic yield of chromosomal abnormalities by CMA and karyotyping in iCPC group was up to 4.1 %, higher than 1.4 % in the control group, p < 0.05. The detection rate of pathogenic or likely pathogenic copy number variants (CNVs) with clinical significance by CMA in iCPC group (1.3 %) was higher than in control group (0 %), p < 0.05. According to the type of chromosome abnormalities, the missed diagnosis rate of non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) was 1.6 % in our study.
CONCLUSIONS: The presence of iCPC on ultrasound examination suggests a potential indication for genetic counseling. Karyotyping and chromosomal microarray analysis may be considered for fetuses with iCPC. It is important to be aware of the limitations of non-invasive prenatal testing, as there is a possibility of residual risk.
METHODS: A total of 315 fetuses with iCPC (iCPC group) and 364 fetuses without abnormal ultrasound findings (control group) were recruited between July 2014 to March 2018.
RESULTS: The overall diagnostic yield of chromosomal abnormalities by CMA and karyotyping in iCPC group was up to 4.1 %, higher than 1.4 % in the control group, p < 0.05. The detection rate of pathogenic or likely pathogenic copy number variants (CNVs) with clinical significance by CMA in iCPC group (1.3 %) was higher than in control group (0 %), p < 0.05. According to the type of chromosome abnormalities, the missed diagnosis rate of non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) was 1.6 % in our study.
CONCLUSIONS: The presence of iCPC on ultrasound examination suggests a potential indication for genetic counseling. Karyotyping and chromosomal microarray analysis may be considered for fetuses with iCPC. It is important to be aware of the limitations of non-invasive prenatal testing, as there is a possibility of residual risk.