MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1136/bjo-2023-324446

Медицинская библиотека · The British journal of ophthalmology · 2024

ICGA-GPT: report generation and question answering for indocyanine green angiography images.

Chen Xiaolan, Zhang Weiyi, Zhao Ziwei, Xu Pusheng, Zheng Yingfeng, Shi Danli, He Mingguang

СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Indocyanine green angiography (ICGA) is vital for diagnosing chorioretinal diseases, but its interpretation and patient communication require extensive expertise and time-consuming efforts. We aim to develop a bilingual ICGA report generation and question-answering (QA) system.

METHODS

Our dataset comprised 213 129 ICGA images from 2919 participants. The system comprised two stages: image-text alignment for report generation by a multimodal transformer architecture, and large language model (LLM)-based QA with ICGA text reports and human-input questions. Performance was assessed using both qualitative metrics (including Bilingual Evaluation Understudy (BLEU), Consensus-based Image Description Evaluation (CIDEr), Recall-Oriented Understudy for Gisting Evaluation-Longest Common Subsequence (ROUGE-L), Semantic Propositional Image Caption Evaluation (SPICE), accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, precision and F1 score) and subjective evaluation by three experienced ophthalmologists using 5-point scales (5 refers to high quality).

RESULTS

We produced 8757 ICGA reports covering 39 disease-related conditions after bilingual translation (66.7% English, 33.3% Chinese). The ICGA-GPT model's report generation performance was evaluated with BLEU scores (1-4) of 0.48, 0.44, 0.40 and 0.37; CIDEr of 0.82; ROUGE of 0.41 and SPICE of 0.18. For disease-based metrics, the average specificity, accuracy, precision, sensitivity and F1 score were 0.98, 0.94, 0.70, 0.68 and 0.64, respectively. Assessing the quality of 50 images (100 reports), three ophthalmologists achieved substantial agreement (kappa=0.723 for completeness, kappa=0.738 for accuracy), yielding scores from 3.20 to 3.55. In an interactive QA scenario involving 100 generated answers, the ophthalmologists provided scores of 4.24, 4.22 and 4.10, displaying good consistency (kappa=0.779).

CONCLUSION

This pioneering study introduces the ICGA-GPT model for report generation and interactive QA for the first time, underscoring the potential of LLMs in assisting with automated ICGA image interpretation.

Для цитирования: Chen Xiaolan, Zhang Weiyi, Zhao Ziwei, Xu Pusheng, Zheng Yingfeng, Shi Danli, He Mingguang. ICGA-GPT: report generation and question answering for indocyanine green angiography images.. The British journal of ophthalmology. 2024. DOI: 10.1136/bjo-2023-324446.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.