Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2014
Proton beam therapy for presumed and confirmed iris melanomas: a review of 36 cases.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Rahmi Ahmed, Mammar Hamid, Thariat Juliette, Angellier Gaelle, Herault Joel, Chauvel Pierre, Kodjikian Laurent, Denis Philippe, Grange Jean Daniel
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: To report the clinical features and outcomes of iris melanomas treated by proton beam therapy.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted at the Croix-Rousse University Hospital of Lyon, Department of Ophthalmology, in 36 patients treated by proton beam therapy for presumed (n = 29) and confirmed (n = 7) iris melanomas between July 1997 and October 2010. Ciliary body melanomas with iris involvement were excluded. The patients' mean age was 54.4 years (range, 22-82 years). The average tumor diameter was 3.8 mm (range, 2.5-8.0). The iridocorneal angle was invaded by the tumor in 47% of cases (n = 17), the ciliary body in 17% of cases (n = 6), and the sclera in 3% (n = 1). Raised intraocular pressure was present before treatment in 11.1 % of cases (n = 4). Tumor biopsy was performed in 19% of cases (n = 7). Four patients had undergone an initial incomplete surgical excision of tumor before radiotherapy. Surgical preparation of the eye with tantalum ring positioning had been performed in all cases 3-4 weeks before irradiation. The prescribed dose was 60 Cobalt Gray Equivalent (CGE) of proton beam radiotherapy delivered in four fractions on four consecutive days.
RESULTS: The median follow-up was 50 months (mean 60.5, range 15-136). One patient (2.7%) was lost to follow-up. None of the patients showed tumor progression, local recurrence, or metastasis. None of the patients required secondary enucleation. Cataract was developed in 62% of patients, glaucoma in two cases (6%) after irradiation, and hyphema with the aggravation of pre-existing glaucoma in one patient. No patients developed neovascular glaucoma.
CONCLUSIONS: Proton beam therapy appears to be the treatment of choice for the conservative treatment of iris melanomas with excellent tumor control and an acceptable rate of complications. Longer follow-up studies on a larger series is necessary to consolidate these results.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted at the Croix-Rousse University Hospital of Lyon, Department of Ophthalmology, in 36 patients treated by proton beam therapy for presumed (n = 29) and confirmed (n = 7) iris melanomas between July 1997 and October 2010. Ciliary body melanomas with iris involvement were excluded. The patients' mean age was 54.4 years (range, 22-82 years). The average tumor diameter was 3.8 mm (range, 2.5-8.0). The iridocorneal angle was invaded by the tumor in 47% of cases (n = 17), the ciliary body in 17% of cases (n = 6), and the sclera in 3% (n = 1). Raised intraocular pressure was present before treatment in 11.1 % of cases (n = 4). Tumor biopsy was performed in 19% of cases (n = 7). Four patients had undergone an initial incomplete surgical excision of tumor before radiotherapy. Surgical preparation of the eye with tantalum ring positioning had been performed in all cases 3-4 weeks before irradiation. The prescribed dose was 60 Cobalt Gray Equivalent (CGE) of proton beam radiotherapy delivered in four fractions on four consecutive days.
RESULTS: The median follow-up was 50 months (mean 60.5, range 15-136). One patient (2.7%) was lost to follow-up. None of the patients showed tumor progression, local recurrence, or metastasis. None of the patients required secondary enucleation. Cataract was developed in 62% of patients, glaucoma in two cases (6%) after irradiation, and hyphema with the aggravation of pre-existing glaucoma in one patient. No patients developed neovascular glaucoma.
CONCLUSIONS: Proton beam therapy appears to be the treatment of choice for the conservative treatment of iris melanomas with excellent tumor control and an acceptable rate of complications. Longer follow-up studies on a larger series is necessary to consolidate these results.