Neurosurgical review · 2020
A novel needle electrode for intraoperative fourth cranial nerve neurophysiological mapping.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Sato Taku, Itakura Takeshi, Bakhit Mudathir, Iwatate Kensho, Sasaki Hiroto, Kishida Yugo, Jinguji Shinya, Fujii Masazumi, Sakuma Jun, Saito Kiyoshi
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: Trochlear nerve (CN-IV) mapping method has not been confirmed to date. The compound muscle action potential (CMAP) of CN-IV cannot be recorded because of the low mapping sensitivity and anatomical characteristics of the superior oblique muscle (SOM). The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of a novel needle electrode (NNE), for the intraoperative mapping of CN-IV.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The NNEs were inserted in the target extraocular muscles in 19 patients. We compared the CMAP amplitude of the NNE with that of the conventional needle electrode (CNE). Furthermore, we investigated the dissimilarity between the CMAP of the CN-IV and other extraocular cranial nerves (ECNs) and the correlation between the readings of the CN-IV mapping and its postoperative functional outcome.
RESULTS: The CMAP of CN-IV has been measured in nine patients (47.4%). The CMAP of CN-IV was distinguishable from other ECNs. The CMAP of the NNE was found to be three times higher than that of the CNE. Although the NNE has shown the potential to record the CN-IV's CMAP, 4 cases ended up having a CN-IV postoperative dysfunction.
CONCLUSIONS: For the first time, we confirmed the possibility of intraoperative mapping the CN-IV using an NNE inserted into the SOM. The NNE can also be useful for other neurophysiological monitoring methods.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The NNEs were inserted in the target extraocular muscles in 19 patients. We compared the CMAP amplitude of the NNE with that of the conventional needle electrode (CNE). Furthermore, we investigated the dissimilarity between the CMAP of the CN-IV and other extraocular cranial nerves (ECNs) and the correlation between the readings of the CN-IV mapping and its postoperative functional outcome.
RESULTS: The CMAP of CN-IV has been measured in nine patients (47.4%). The CMAP of CN-IV was distinguishable from other ECNs. The CMAP of the NNE was found to be three times higher than that of the CNE. Although the NNE has shown the potential to record the CN-IV's CMAP, 4 cases ended up having a CN-IV postoperative dysfunction.
CONCLUSIONS: For the first time, we confirmed the possibility of intraoperative mapping the CN-IV using an NNE inserted into the SOM. The NNE can also be useful for other neurophysiological monitoring methods.