Experimental and clinical endocrinology & diabetes : official journal, German Society of Endocrinology [and] German Diabetes Association · 2019
Is the Preoperative Glycated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) Level Predictive of the Severity of Diabetic Hand Infection According to Surgical and Clinical Outcomes?
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Gürbüz Kaan, Ekinci Yakup
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: We purposed to investigate whether preoperative HbA1c level is associated with the severity of surgical treatment in diabetic hand infection cases.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between December 2015 and October 2018, 102 patients were surgically treated due to diabetic hand infection. Of the patients, 75 who met the criteria for diabetic hand infection were included in the study. The patients were divided into two groups: Group 1, < 8.5% HbA1c level (poorly controlled); and Group 2, 8.5% or higher HbA1c level (uncontrolled). Preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative data were recorded. Drainage, VAC, ray/open amputation, and microsurgical reconstruction were performed according to the examination and clinical findings. p<0.05 was considered statistically significant.
RESULTS: The study groups consisted of 41 patients (5 female/36 male; median age 59 years, range 32-68) in Group 1 and 34 patients (6 female/28 male; median age 62 years, range 28-67) in Group 2. The mean follow-up period was 21.14±10.42 months in Group 1 and 16.70±10.19 months in Group 2, which were not significantly different (p>0.05). The most common microbiological pathogen was polymicrobial in both study groups (39% in Group 1 and 41.2% in Group 2). Drainage was the most common surgical procedure in both groups and there was no significant difference between the groups in terms of the surgical techniques that were used (p>0.05).
CONCLUSION: Although HbA1c level is an important biomarker for monitoring glycemia in diabetic patients, it is not associated with the severity of surgical treatment in diabetic hand infections.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between December 2015 and October 2018, 102 patients were surgically treated due to diabetic hand infection. Of the patients, 75 who met the criteria for diabetic hand infection were included in the study. The patients were divided into two groups: Group 1, < 8.5% HbA1c level (poorly controlled); and Group 2, 8.5% or higher HbA1c level (uncontrolled). Preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative data were recorded. Drainage, VAC, ray/open amputation, and microsurgical reconstruction were performed according to the examination and clinical findings. p<0.05 was considered statistically significant.
RESULTS: The study groups consisted of 41 patients (5 female/36 male; median age 59 years, range 32-68) in Group 1 and 34 patients (6 female/28 male; median age 62 years, range 28-67) in Group 2. The mean follow-up period was 21.14±10.42 months in Group 1 and 16.70±10.19 months in Group 2, which were not significantly different (p>0.05). The most common microbiological pathogen was polymicrobial in both study groups (39% in Group 1 and 41.2% in Group 2). Drainage was the most common surgical procedure in both groups and there was no significant difference between the groups in terms of the surgical techniques that were used (p>0.05).
CONCLUSION: Although HbA1c level is an important biomarker for monitoring glycemia in diabetic patients, it is not associated with the severity of surgical treatment in diabetic hand infections.