Respiratory care · 2026
High-Flow Nasal Cannula Reduces Ventilatory Requirements During Endobronchial Ultrasound.
СтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Miechels Jeffrey, Claessens Niels J M, Koning Mark V
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: High-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) reduces dead-space ventilation, but this effect is diminished by open-mouth breathing and partial airway obstruction. Consequently, it is uncertain whether HFNC provides respiratory support during endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS) procedures.
METHODS: A single-center randomized controlled crossover study was conducted at the Rijnstate Hospital, Arnhem, the Netherlands, from November 2022 to August 2024.Patients with severe COPD (Gold III/IV) were evaluated to determine if HFNC reduces dead space ventilation during an EBUS procedure. Exclusion criteria were known neurodegenerative conditions, allergies to propofol or esketamine, pregnancy, upper-airway obstructions, or severe pulmonary hypertension.Subjects received two sequences of HFNC flow (30 and 70 L/min or vice versa) during EBUS.The primary outcome was CO2 washout, determined by a 60-s capnography trace with and without HFNC flow to measure the difference in inspiratory, end-tidal CO2, and β-angle.
RESULTS: Twenty subjects with severe COPD (Gold III/IV) were included (Group A n = 10; Group B n = 10), of which one could not complete the bronchial measurements because of an obstructing carcinoma. CO2 washout at carina was observed at 70 L/min of HFNC flow, demonstrated by a reduced inspiratory CO2 of mean 6.0 mm Hg (95% CI: 4.5-8.3, P < .001) and end-tidal CO2 of 5.3 mm Hg (95% CI: 2.3-7.5, P = .002), but not at 30 L/min of HFNC flow (mean inspiratory CO2 difference of 1.5 mm Hg (95% CI: -2.3 to 6.0, P = .69) and mean end-tidal CO2 difference of 0.8 mm Hg (95% CI: -2.3 to 3.0, P = .35). A flow of 70 L/min reduced inspiratory CO2 in the left main bronchus (mean = 5.3 mm Hg; 95% CI: 2.3-8.3, P < .001), but not the end-tidal CO2 (mean = 3.0 mm Hg; 95% CI: 0.0-6.0, P = .07).
CONCLUSIONS: An HFNC flow of 70 L/min reduced dead-space ventilation in subjects with severe COPD undergoing EBUS procedures during deep sedation, suggesting respiratory support during this procedure.
METHODS: A single-center randomized controlled crossover study was conducted at the Rijnstate Hospital, Arnhem, the Netherlands, from November 2022 to August 2024.Patients with severe COPD (Gold III/IV) were evaluated to determine if HFNC reduces dead space ventilation during an EBUS procedure. Exclusion criteria were known neurodegenerative conditions, allergies to propofol or esketamine, pregnancy, upper-airway obstructions, or severe pulmonary hypertension.Subjects received two sequences of HFNC flow (30 and 70 L/min or vice versa) during EBUS.The primary outcome was CO2 washout, determined by a 60-s capnography trace with and without HFNC flow to measure the difference in inspiratory, end-tidal CO2, and β-angle.
RESULTS: Twenty subjects with severe COPD (Gold III/IV) were included (Group A n = 10; Group B n = 10), of which one could not complete the bronchial measurements because of an obstructing carcinoma. CO2 washout at carina was observed at 70 L/min of HFNC flow, demonstrated by a reduced inspiratory CO2 of mean 6.0 mm Hg (95% CI: 4.5-8.3, P < .001) and end-tidal CO2 of 5.3 mm Hg (95% CI: 2.3-7.5, P = .002), but not at 30 L/min of HFNC flow (mean inspiratory CO2 difference of 1.5 mm Hg (95% CI: -2.3 to 6.0, P = .69) and mean end-tidal CO2 difference of 0.8 mm Hg (95% CI: -2.3 to 3.0, P = .35). A flow of 70 L/min reduced inspiratory CO2 in the left main bronchus (mean = 5.3 mm Hg; 95% CI: 2.3-8.3, P < .001), but not the end-tidal CO2 (mean = 3.0 mm Hg; 95% CI: 0.0-6.0, P = .07).
CONCLUSIONS: An HFNC flow of 70 L/min reduced dead-space ventilation in subjects with severe COPD undergoing EBUS procedures during deep sedation, suggesting respiratory support during this procedure.