Utilization and Outcomes of Permanent Pacemakers After Bicaval Heart Transplantation: A Large Institutional Experience.

BACKGROUND

Permanent pacemaker (PPM) implantation after heart transplantation (HT) is common, but contemporary data regarding utilization, outcomes, and emerging pacing technologies are limited.

METHODS

We studied PPM placement among 1225 bicaval HT recipients (28% women) treated at our institution from 2010 to 2025 and compared PPM recipients with HT patients without PPMs matched on sex, age, and transplant year.

RESULTS

Median age at HT was 58 years (interquartile range, 48-65 years). Sixty-six (5%) patients received a PPM, with stable implantation rates over time. Median HT-to-PPM time was 4.3 months (interquartile range, 2 weeks to 4.8 years). The main indications were sinus node dysfunction (41 patients, 62%) or atrioventricular block (19 patients, 29%). Median post-HT survival was similar between PPM and non-PPM recipients (12.8 versus 11.5 years, P=0.14). Older organ donor age independently predicted PPM placement (odds ratio, 1.75; P=0.04). After 3.2 years of median follow-up, 1 transvenous PPM had a major complication requiring device extraction. Thirteen (20%) patients received leadless PPMs, including 3 atrial leadless PPMs and 1 dual-chamber leadless PPM. Leadless PPMs had no short-term complications over 1 year of median follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Post-HT PPM implantation rates were low and unchanged since 2010. Most devices were implanted for sinus node dysfunction, with 44% implanted within 1 month post-HT. PPM placement was not associated with post-HT survival. Advanced organ donor age was associated with risk of PPM placement. Transvenous PPM complication rates were comparable to rates described in general populations. Leadless PPMs accounted for a substantial minority of PPM placements since their introduction in 2018, with no complications to date. Longer follow-up is needed to establish their long-term outcomes and safety in patients with HT.