Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology · 2005
Hemodynamic effects of atrial septal pacing in cardiac resynchronization therapy patients.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Di Pede Francesco, Gasparini Gianni, De Piccoli Bruno, Yu Yinghong, Cuesta Francisca, Raviele Antonio
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: Spontaneous or pacing-induced interatrial conduction delay may affect the outcome of heart failure patients treated with cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). The objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of the atrial pacing site (right atrial appendage, RAA; and low interatrial septum, LIS) during biventricular (BV) pacing on the left ventricular (LV) systolic function in candidates for CRT.
METHODS AND RESULTS: Fifteen heart failure patients with left bundle branch block and LV ejection fraction < or =35% were enrolled. Electrodes were placed at the RAA, LIS, right ventricular apex, and LV free wall. A DDD protocol was tested, which consisted of 50 beats in AAI mode from the RAA followed by 50 beats in BV DDD mode with atrial pacing at the RAA (DDD_RAA) or at the LIS (DDD_LIS) at four AV delays. The average (+/-SD)%LV+dP/dtmax increase during DDD_RAA and DDD_LIS pacing with respect to baseline was 24 +/- 16% and 21 +/- 15%, respectively (P < 0.01), and average percentage change in aortic pulse pressure during DDD_RAA and DDD_LIS with respect to baseline (%PP) was 13 +/- 8% and 13 +/- 7% (ns).
CONCLUSIONS: Our results show a significant hemodynamic improvement with both DDD_RAA and DDD_LIS biventricular pacing compared to AAI pacing. However DDD_LIS pacing was not superior to DDD_RAA pacing in acute hemodynamic responses.
METHODS AND RESULTS: Fifteen heart failure patients with left bundle branch block and LV ejection fraction < or =35% were enrolled. Electrodes were placed at the RAA, LIS, right ventricular apex, and LV free wall. A DDD protocol was tested, which consisted of 50 beats in AAI mode from the RAA followed by 50 beats in BV DDD mode with atrial pacing at the RAA (DDD_RAA) or at the LIS (DDD_LIS) at four AV delays. The average (+/-SD)%LV+dP/dtmax increase during DDD_RAA and DDD_LIS pacing with respect to baseline was 24 +/- 16% and 21 +/- 15%, respectively (P < 0.01), and average percentage change in aortic pulse pressure during DDD_RAA and DDD_LIS with respect to baseline (%PP) was 13 +/- 8% and 13 +/- 7% (ns).
CONCLUSIONS: Our results show a significant hemodynamic improvement with both DDD_RAA and DDD_LIS biventricular pacing compared to AAI pacing. However DDD_LIS pacing was not superior to DDD_RAA pacing in acute hemodynamic responses.