Annales de cardiologie et d'angeiologie · 2005
[Clinical and therapeutic specificities of myocardial infarction in patients with peripheral arterial disease: the USIC 2000 registry].
Аннотация на английскомСтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Aboyans V, Cambou J P, Hanania G, Cantet C, Ferrières J, Guéret P, Blanchard D, Lablanche J M, Lacroix P, Boutalbi Y, Danchin N
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: Several studies underlined the worse prognosis of myocardial infarction (MI) among patients with peripheral arterial disease (PAD). We sought to describe the presentation and management modalities of a cohort of PAD patients presenting an acute MI, compared to those without PAD.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The USIC 2000 registry, a nationwide database on all patients admitted to a CCU for an acute MI < 48 hours in France in November 2000 was used for this study.
RESULTS: Among the 2311 patients included, PAD was reported in 215 subjects (9.3%). In multivariate analysis, the following factors were positively related to the presence of PAD (P < or = 0.05): age >75 y (OR = 2.3), diabetes (OR = 2.0), hypertension (OR = 1.4), active smoking (OR = 4.6), renal failure (OR =3.1), and treatments with antiplatelets (OR = 3.9), anti-vitamin K (OR = 1.9), statins (OR = 1.7) and low molecular weight heparins (OR = 6.8). By introducing the data concerning the arrival in CCUs in the model, the following factors were also significantly more frequent among PAD patients: male sex (OR = 1.6), past history of coronary artery disease (OR = 2.2), left bundle branch block (OR = 1.8) and late management >6 hours (OR = 1.4). Conversely, ST-segment elevation was less frequent (OR = 0.7). When the CCU stay data were introduced in the model, a lower rate of coronary stenting (OR = 0.7) and betablockers use within 48 hours of admission (OR = 0.6) were noted.
CONCLUSION: Beyond the presence of PAD per se, several particularities do exist, especially the coexistence of a high number of pejorative factors and an under-utilization of treatments presenting prognostic benefits.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The USIC 2000 registry, a nationwide database on all patients admitted to a CCU for an acute MI < 48 hours in France in November 2000 was used for this study.
RESULTS: Among the 2311 patients included, PAD was reported in 215 subjects (9.3%). In multivariate analysis, the following factors were positively related to the presence of PAD (P < or = 0.05): age >75 y (OR = 2.3), diabetes (OR = 2.0), hypertension (OR = 1.4), active smoking (OR = 4.6), renal failure (OR =3.1), and treatments with antiplatelets (OR = 3.9), anti-vitamin K (OR = 1.9), statins (OR = 1.7) and low molecular weight heparins (OR = 6.8). By introducing the data concerning the arrival in CCUs in the model, the following factors were also significantly more frequent among PAD patients: male sex (OR = 1.6), past history of coronary artery disease (OR = 2.2), left bundle branch block (OR = 1.8) and late management >6 hours (OR = 1.4). Conversely, ST-segment elevation was less frequent (OR = 0.7). When the CCU stay data were introduced in the model, a lower rate of coronary stenting (OR = 0.7) and betablockers use within 48 hours of admission (OR = 0.6) were noted.
CONCLUSION: Beyond the presence of PAD per se, several particularities do exist, especially the coexistence of a high number of pejorative factors and an under-utilization of treatments presenting prognostic benefits.