American heart journal · 2003
Impact of angina burden and other factors on treatment satisfaction after acute coronary syndromes.
СтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеПоддержка правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Beinart Sean C, Sales Anne E, Spertus John A, Plomondon Mary E, Every Nathan R, Rumsfeld John S
Аннотация
PURPOSE: Although of great importance to clinicians, hospitals, and health care systems, little is known about factors that influence treatment satisfaction after acute coronary syndromes (ACS). The objective of this study was to identify potentially modifiable factors associated with treatment satisfaction 7 months after ACS.
METHODS: The study population included 1957 patients with ACS who were enrolled in the multicenter, prospective Veterans' Health Administration Access to Cardiology Study. The primary outcome was treatment satisfaction 7 months after ACS as measured by the Seattle Angina Questionnaire. Multivariable regression models were developed to determine the association between treatment satisfaction and patient characteristics, physician-patient communication, and current angina frequency.
RESULTS: Patient characteristics associated with reduced treatment satisfaction included a history of depression, atrial fibrillation, prior heart surgery, arthritis, hypertension, younger age, and a discharge diagnosis of unstable angina (as opposed to myocardial infarction). After adjusting for patient characteristics, patient-reported inability to reach one or more of their physicians (OR, 2.40; 95% CI, 1.47 to 3.91), being given confusing information (OR, 3.48; 95% CI, 2.08 to 5.83), and poor overall communication with one or more of their physicians (OR, 4.94; 95% CI, 2.93 to 8.34) were all associated with reduced satisfaction. Finally, after adjustment for both patient characteristics and physician communication, weekly (OR, 3.52; 95% CI, 2.28 to 5.45) and daily angina (OR, 3.88; 95% CI, 2.23 to 6.75) were associated with worse treatment satisfaction.
CONCLUSIONS: Current angina symptoms and aspects of physician communication are independently associated with treatment satisfaction after ACS. These results suggest that treatment satisfaction may be improved through better communication and better control of angina symptoms.
METHODS: The study population included 1957 patients with ACS who were enrolled in the multicenter, prospective Veterans' Health Administration Access to Cardiology Study. The primary outcome was treatment satisfaction 7 months after ACS as measured by the Seattle Angina Questionnaire. Multivariable regression models were developed to determine the association between treatment satisfaction and patient characteristics, physician-patient communication, and current angina frequency.
RESULTS: Patient characteristics associated with reduced treatment satisfaction included a history of depression, atrial fibrillation, prior heart surgery, arthritis, hypertension, younger age, and a discharge diagnosis of unstable angina (as opposed to myocardial infarction). After adjusting for patient characteristics, patient-reported inability to reach one or more of their physicians (OR, 2.40; 95% CI, 1.47 to 3.91), being given confusing information (OR, 3.48; 95% CI, 2.08 to 5.83), and poor overall communication with one or more of their physicians (OR, 4.94; 95% CI, 2.93 to 8.34) were all associated with reduced satisfaction. Finally, after adjustment for both patient characteristics and physician communication, weekly (OR, 3.52; 95% CI, 2.28 to 5.45) and daily angina (OR, 3.88; 95% CI, 2.23 to 6.75) were associated with worse treatment satisfaction.
CONCLUSIONS: Current angina symptoms and aspects of physician communication are independently associated with treatment satisfaction after ACS. These results suggest that treatment satisfaction may be improved through better communication and better control of angina symptoms.