International journal of cardiology · 2015
Mitral regurgitation prior to transcatheter aortic valve implantation influences survival but not symptoms.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Boerlage-van Dijk Kirsten, Wiegerinck Esther M A, Takama Takuro, Koch Karel T, Vis M Marije, de Mol Bas A J M, Piek Jan J, Bouma Berto J, Baan Jan
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Current data about the impact of concomitant mitral regurgitation (MR) on outcome in patients who undergo transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) are conflicting. Our purpose was to analyze the clinical course of MR and to assess the influence of MR on survival and clinical status after TAVI.
METHODS: We included 375 consecutive patients who underwent TAVI. MR grade and NYHA class were determined before TAVI and at follow-up.
RESULTS: In total 171 patients (46%) had MR grade ≥ 2 at baseline and of these 29% improved to MR grade ≤ 1 after TAVI. MR grade ≤ 1 at baseline was present in 204 patients (54%) and of these 17% worsened to grade ≥ 2 after TAVI. Improvement of MR was associated with absence of atrial fibrillation (OR: 2.35, 95%CI: 1.17-4.71, p = 0.02). Worsening of MR was associated with moderate or more aortic valve regurgitation after TAVI (OR: 4.2, CI: 1.83-9.49, p = 0.001). NYHA class improved at follow-up. Baseline MR grade did not determine the degree of clinical improvement (MR grade ≤ 1: NYHA ≥ 3 from 67% to 17%; MR grade ≥ 2: NYHA ≥ 3 from 69% to 14%). Although patients with MR grade ≥ 2 at baseline improved symptomatically, this degree of MR was associated with reduced two year survival compared with patients with MR grade ≤ 1(mortality 37% vs 26%; HR 1.99; 95% CI 1.27-3.13; p = 0.003).
CONCLUSION: In patients who undergo TAVI almost half have MR grade ≥ 2 prior to the procedure. TAVI had no influence on MR grade at follow-up. Although patients with MR grade ≥ 2 at baseline improved symptomatically after TAVI, concomitant MR at baseline significantly reduced two year survival.
METHODS: We included 375 consecutive patients who underwent TAVI. MR grade and NYHA class were determined before TAVI and at follow-up.
RESULTS: In total 171 patients (46%) had MR grade ≥ 2 at baseline and of these 29% improved to MR grade ≤ 1 after TAVI. MR grade ≤ 1 at baseline was present in 204 patients (54%) and of these 17% worsened to grade ≥ 2 after TAVI. Improvement of MR was associated with absence of atrial fibrillation (OR: 2.35, 95%CI: 1.17-4.71, p = 0.02). Worsening of MR was associated with moderate or more aortic valve regurgitation after TAVI (OR: 4.2, CI: 1.83-9.49, p = 0.001). NYHA class improved at follow-up. Baseline MR grade did not determine the degree of clinical improvement (MR grade ≤ 1: NYHA ≥ 3 from 67% to 17%; MR grade ≥ 2: NYHA ≥ 3 from 69% to 14%). Although patients with MR grade ≥ 2 at baseline improved symptomatically, this degree of MR was associated with reduced two year survival compared with patients with MR grade ≤ 1(mortality 37% vs 26%; HR 1.99; 95% CI 1.27-3.13; p = 0.003).
CONCLUSION: In patients who undergo TAVI almost half have MR grade ≥ 2 prior to the procedure. TAVI had no influence on MR grade at follow-up. Although patients with MR grade ≥ 2 at baseline improved symptomatically after TAVI, concomitant MR at baseline significantly reduced two year survival.