British journal of nursing (Mark Allen Publishing) · 2001
Evaluation of two coated catheters in intermittent self-catheterization.
Клиническое исследованиеСравнительное исследованиеСтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеРандомизированное исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Pascoe G, Clovis S
Аннотация
Intermittent self-catheterization (ISC) has addressed the problems of mechanical or functional urological voiding since the 1970s. Patient quality of life is enhanced by the increased independence and security offered by ISC (Lapides et al, 1972). A randomized, comparative crossover study was undertaken in two centres to evaluate the performance of SpeediCath (Coloplast) and Lofric (Astra Tech) catheters. A total of 27 subjects were recruited, all of whom had been performing ISC more than twice a day for longer than 3 months with a coated catheter. Each catheter was used for 1 week to assess catheter performance and acceptability. There were no significant differences recorded for the performance of each catheter. However, SpeediCath demonstrated favourable statistical significance in relation to ease of use, speed of use, and the concept of water as an integral part of the packaging of the catheter.