Analytical and quantitative cytology and histology · 2002
Comparative image analysis of cells in voided and catheterized urine.
Клиническое исследованиеСравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Hattori Manabu, Ohno Eiji, Kakinuma Hirokuni, Uchida Toyoaki, Kuramoto Hiroyuki
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To objectively evaluate the difference in cytologic findings between specimens of voided and catheterized urine by using a comparative image analysis device, CAS200.
STUDY DESIGN: Cells in voided and catheterized urine from 13 patients with transitional cell carcinoma (TCC), including 3 with grade 1, 6 with grade 2 and 4 with grade 3, were compared cytologically. The cellular area, nuclear area, nuclear/cytoplasmic ratio and nuclear density of both types of cytologic specimen were measured using CAS200.
RESULTS: Cell area and nuclear area of grade 1 TCCs were significantly greater in voided urine than in catheterized urine. In contrast, cell area and nuclear area of grade 3 TCCs were significantly smaller in voided urine than in catheterized urine (P < .01), and nuclear density of grade 3 TCCs was higher in the latter than in the former.
CONCLUSION: The cellular findings in voided urine were different from those in catheterized urine from the same patient. Thus, the method selected for obtaining urine specimens will affect the findings in urinary cytology.
STUDY DESIGN: Cells in voided and catheterized urine from 13 patients with transitional cell carcinoma (TCC), including 3 with grade 1, 6 with grade 2 and 4 with grade 3, were compared cytologically. The cellular area, nuclear area, nuclear/cytoplasmic ratio and nuclear density of both types of cytologic specimen were measured using CAS200.
RESULTS: Cell area and nuclear area of grade 1 TCCs were significantly greater in voided urine than in catheterized urine. In contrast, cell area and nuclear area of grade 3 TCCs were significantly smaller in voided urine than in catheterized urine (P < .01), and nuclear density of grade 3 TCCs was higher in the latter than in the former.
CONCLUSION: The cellular findings in voided urine were different from those in catheterized urine from the same patient. Thus, the method selected for obtaining urine specimens will affect the findings in urinary cytology.