JACC. Cardiovascular interventions · 2015
Repeat MitraClip Therapy for Significant Recurrent Mitral Regurgitation in High Surgical Risk Patients: Impact of Loss of Leaflet Insertion.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Kreidel Felix, Frerker Christian, Schlüter Michael, Alessandrini Hannes, Thielsen Thomas, Geidel Stephan, Schäfer Ulrich, Kuck Karl-Heinz
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: The goal of this study was to assess procedural details and outcomes of repeat MitraClip therapy.
BACKGROUND: MitraClip implantation is a safe and efficacious percutaneous approach to treat significant mitral regurgitation (MR).
METHODS: Of 410 inoperable or high surgical risk patients treated with the MitraClip at our institution, 17 (4.1%) patients, as well as 4 patients initially treated at external institutions, underwent repeat MitraClip procedures. Mean age of the 21 patients (14 men [67%]) was 77 years; 15 patients (71%) had functional MR.
RESULTS: Repeat procedures performed at a median of 6.3 months (range 0.7 to 34 months) after the index intervention were successful (discharge MR grade ≤2+) in 13 patients (62%), with a pronounced difference in success rate observed between the 13 patients with adequate leaflet insertion at the time of the repeat intervention and the 8 patients in whom loss of leaflet insertion (LLI) (leaflet tear/perforation or partial clip detachment) was present (11 of 13 [85%] vs. 2 of 8 [25%], respectively). The 21 patients were followed for a median of 8.5 (interquartile range: 2.3 to 18.6) months; 13 patients (62%), 8 with adequate leaflet insertion and 5 with LLI, died during follow-up.
CONCLUSIONS: Repeat MitraClip intervention for significant recurrent MR appears to be a viable therapeutic approach in patients in whom leaflet insertion into the MitraClip is not compromised. LLI is strongly associated with repeat procedural failure.
BACKGROUND: MitraClip implantation is a safe and efficacious percutaneous approach to treat significant mitral regurgitation (MR).
METHODS: Of 410 inoperable or high surgical risk patients treated with the MitraClip at our institution, 17 (4.1%) patients, as well as 4 patients initially treated at external institutions, underwent repeat MitraClip procedures. Mean age of the 21 patients (14 men [67%]) was 77 years; 15 patients (71%) had functional MR.
RESULTS: Repeat procedures performed at a median of 6.3 months (range 0.7 to 34 months) after the index intervention were successful (discharge MR grade ≤2+) in 13 patients (62%), with a pronounced difference in success rate observed between the 13 patients with adequate leaflet insertion at the time of the repeat intervention and the 8 patients in whom loss of leaflet insertion (LLI) (leaflet tear/perforation or partial clip detachment) was present (11 of 13 [85%] vs. 2 of 8 [25%], respectively). The 21 patients were followed for a median of 8.5 (interquartile range: 2.3 to 18.6) months; 13 patients (62%), 8 with adequate leaflet insertion and 5 with LLI, died during follow-up.
CONCLUSIONS: Repeat MitraClip intervention for significant recurrent MR appears to be a viable therapeutic approach in patients in whom leaflet insertion into the MitraClip is not compromised. LLI is strongly associated with repeat procedural failure.