Circulation journal : official journal of the Japanese Circulation Society · 2013
Angioscopic assessment of peri-stent contrast staining following drug-eluting stent implantation.
Клиническое исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Ishihara Takayuki, Awata Masaki, Fujita Masashi, Watanabe Tetsuya, Iida Osamu, Ishida Yoshio, Nanto Shinsuke, Uematsu Masaaki
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Peri-stent contrast staining (PSS) has been recognized as a predictor of late stent thrombosis following drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation. However, the intravascular conditions at PSS sites remain unclear.
METHODS AND RESULTS: We evaluated 10 patients (median age 72 years, 80% male) with stable angina pectoris by coronary angioscopy. The patients had a total of 11 DES implantations (5 sirolimus-eluting stents; 4 paclitaxel-eluting stents; 2 everolimus-eluting stents) that showed PSS. Neointimal coverage (NIC), presence of thrombus, and yellow plaques underneath the stent were compared between PSS and non-PSS sites for each stent. NIC was graded as: grade 0, struts exposed; grade 1, struts bulging into the lumen, although covered; grade 2, struts embedded by neointima, but translucent; grade 3, struts fully embedded and invisible. Mean follow-up was 394±206 days (median: 289). NIC grade was lower at PSS sites (P=0.021) with 8 out of 11 stents (73%) having grade 0. Angioscopy detected a thrombus more frequently at PSS sites than at non-PSS sites (64% vs. 9%, P=0.012). Yellow plaques tended to be more significant at PSS sites than at non-PSS sites (82% vs. 45%, P=0.091).
CONCLUSIONS: The angioscopic findings suggest high thrombogenicity at PSS sites.
METHODS AND RESULTS: We evaluated 10 patients (median age 72 years, 80% male) with stable angina pectoris by coronary angioscopy. The patients had a total of 11 DES implantations (5 sirolimus-eluting stents; 4 paclitaxel-eluting stents; 2 everolimus-eluting stents) that showed PSS. Neointimal coverage (NIC), presence of thrombus, and yellow plaques underneath the stent were compared between PSS and non-PSS sites for each stent. NIC was graded as: grade 0, struts exposed; grade 1, struts bulging into the lumen, although covered; grade 2, struts embedded by neointima, but translucent; grade 3, struts fully embedded and invisible. Mean follow-up was 394±206 days (median: 289). NIC grade was lower at PSS sites (P=0.021) with 8 out of 11 stents (73%) having grade 0. Angioscopy detected a thrombus more frequently at PSS sites than at non-PSS sites (64% vs. 9%, P=0.012). Yellow plaques tended to be more significant at PSS sites than at non-PSS sites (82% vs. 45%, P=0.091).
CONCLUSIONS: The angioscopic findings suggest high thrombogenicity at PSS sites.