DOI 10.1148/radiology.207.3.9609891
Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt patency and the importance of stenosis location in the development of recurrent symptoms.
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To analyze in detail the location and types of stenosis and occlusion that occur after transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) creation and to determine the relative contribution of these various types of TIPS malfunction to recurrent symptoms of variceal bleeding or ascites.
MATERIALS AND
METHODS
In 116 of 217 patients who underwent TIPS creation between June 1990 and July 1995, follow-up portal venography was performed at 6-month intervals and for symptoms of recurrent variceal bleeding or ascites.
RESULTS
Cumulative primary venographic patency by means of Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was 55% at 6 months and 5% at 2 years. Secondary patency was 92% at 2 years. Stenosis or occlusion occurred in 63 of 116 patients (54%). In 20 patients (17%), acute shunt occlusions developed less than 30 days after TIPS creation; in 24 patients (21%), tract abnormalities were detected after 30 days; and in 19 patients (16%), hepatic vein stenoses were detected after 30 days. Abnormalities of the parenchymal tract were more often correlated with recurrent variceal bleeding or ascites than were hepatic vein stenoses (odds ratio, 3.6; P = .02). Ten of 14 patients (71%) with detected biliary fistulas to their TIPS had symptoms, and all patients with biliary fistulas had tract abnormalities.
CONCLUSION
Tract stenoses and occlusions were the major cause of symptomatic shunt failure after TIPS creation. Substantial bile duct transections are often associated with tract abnormalities and recurrent symptoms. Although common, hepatic vein stenoses were rarely associated with recurrent symptoms in our patient population.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.