Nephron · 2000
Constant, but not pulsed calcitriol suppresses hemodialysis patients' antigen-induced lymphocyte proliferation.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Hannula P M, Antonen J A, Saha H H, Koivisto A M, Krohn K J, Pasternack A I
Аннотация
BACKGROUND/AIMS: In vitro constant calcitriol [1,25-(OH)(2)D(3)] inhibits healthy individuals' T lymphocyte proliferation at supraphysiological concentrations. In contrast, among hemodialysis patients, intravenous 1,25-(OH)(2)D(3) pulse therapy of secondary hyperparathyroidism has been shown to be even immunostimulatory. We studied the effect of in vitro constant and intermittent 1, 25-(OH)(2)D(3) on lymphocyte antigen response of hemodialysis patients.
METHODS: Twelve hemodialysis patients' peripheral blood mononuclear cells were stimulated with purified protein derivative of tuberculin (12.5, 25 and 50 mg/l) or tetanus toxoid (TT; 1,000, 5, 000 and 10,000 Lf/l, limit of flocculation) for 7 days. Constant 1, 25-(OH)(2)D(3) was added to all cultures at concentrations of 0, 10(-10) or 0.25 x 10(-9) mol/l (0, 42 and 105 ng/l) and to half of the cultures additionally as a 0.75 x 10(-9) mmol/l (315-ng/l) pulse on the 5th culture day.
RESULTS: TT-induced lymphocyte proliferation was statistically related to a constant 1,25-(OH)(2)D(3) concentration (p = 0.001, analysis of variance). With constant 1, 25-(OH)(2)D(3) concentrations of 0, 42 and 105 ng/l, the TT-induced responses were 1.53, 1.44 and 1.40 log cpm, respectively (mean of TT concentrations). The responses of the (additionally) pulse-treated cells [1.65, 1.50 and 1.40 log cpm; concentrations of constant 1, 25-(OH)(2)D(3) as above] were similar to those of the nonpulsed cells. Thus constant, but not pulsed 1,25-(OH)(2)D(3) decreased the TT responses. On the purified protein derivative of tuberculin response, neither constant nor pulsed 1,25-(OH)(2)D(3) had any significant effect.
CONCLUSIONS: The decline of TT response with constant 1,25-(OH)(2)D(3) corresponds with findings on immunosuppressive action of 1,25-(OH)(2)D(3) in previous studies done on normal subjects' cells. This was not seen with intermittently applied 1,25-(OH)(2)D(3). These results support the previous concept that intermittent 1,25(OH)(2)D(3) therapy is not immunosuppressive in hemodialysis patients.
METHODS: Twelve hemodialysis patients' peripheral blood mononuclear cells were stimulated with purified protein derivative of tuberculin (12.5, 25 and 50 mg/l) or tetanus toxoid (TT; 1,000, 5, 000 and 10,000 Lf/l, limit of flocculation) for 7 days. Constant 1, 25-(OH)(2)D(3) was added to all cultures at concentrations of 0, 10(-10) or 0.25 x 10(-9) mol/l (0, 42 and 105 ng/l) and to half of the cultures additionally as a 0.75 x 10(-9) mmol/l (315-ng/l) pulse on the 5th culture day.
RESULTS: TT-induced lymphocyte proliferation was statistically related to a constant 1,25-(OH)(2)D(3) concentration (p = 0.001, analysis of variance). With constant 1, 25-(OH)(2)D(3) concentrations of 0, 42 and 105 ng/l, the TT-induced responses were 1.53, 1.44 and 1.40 log cpm, respectively (mean of TT concentrations). The responses of the (additionally) pulse-treated cells [1.65, 1.50 and 1.40 log cpm; concentrations of constant 1, 25-(OH)(2)D(3) as above] were similar to those of the nonpulsed cells. Thus constant, but not pulsed 1,25-(OH)(2)D(3) decreased the TT responses. On the purified protein derivative of tuberculin response, neither constant nor pulsed 1,25-(OH)(2)D(3) had any significant effect.
CONCLUSIONS: The decline of TT response with constant 1,25-(OH)(2)D(3) corresponds with findings on immunosuppressive action of 1,25-(OH)(2)D(3) in previous studies done on normal subjects' cells. This was not seen with intermittently applied 1,25-(OH)(2)D(3). These results support the previous concept that intermittent 1,25(OH)(2)D(3) therapy is not immunosuppressive in hemodialysis patients.