American heart journal · 2002
Arterial elastance and heart-arterial coupling in aortic regurgitation are determined by aortic leak severity.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Segers Patrick, Morimont Philippe, Kolh Philippe, Stergiopulos Nikos, Westerhof Nico, Verdonck Pascal
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: In aortic valve regurgitation (AR), aortic leak severity modulates left ventricle (LV) arterial system interaction. The aim of this study was to assess (1) how arterial elastance (E(a)), calculated as the ratio of LV end-systolic pressure and stroke volume, relates to arterial properties and leak severity and (2) the validity of E(a)/E(max) (with E(max) the slope of the end-systolic pressure-volume relation) as a heart-arterial coupling parameter in AR.
METHODS AND RESULTS: Our work is based on human data obtained from a study on vascular adaptation in chronic AR. These data allowed us to assess the parameters of a computer model of heart-arterial interaction. In particular, total peripheral resistance (R) and aortic leak severity--expressed as leak resistance (R(L,ao))--were quantified for different patient subgroups (group I/IIa/IIb: E(max) = 2.15/0.62/0.47 mm Hg/mL; E(a) = 1.24/0.66/0.90 mm Hg/mL; R = 1.9/0.6/0.85 mm Hg.s/mL, R(L,ao) = 0.35/0.05/0.20 mm Hg.s/mL). A parameter study demonstrated that R(L,ao) was the main determinant of E(a). With all other parameters constant, valve repair would increase E(a) to 2.81, 1.08, and 1.54 mm Hg/mL in groups I, IIa, and IIb, respectively. For a given E(a)/E(max), LV pump efficiency (estimated as the ratio of stroke work and LV systolic pressure-volume area) was lower than the theoretical predicted value, except for the simulations with intact aortic valve.
CONCLUSIONS: In AR, E(a) is determined by aortic leak severity rather than by arterial system properties. Using E(a)/E(max) as a coupling parameter in general or as a mechanico-energetic regulatory parameter in particular is questionable.
METHODS AND RESULTS: Our work is based on human data obtained from a study on vascular adaptation in chronic AR. These data allowed us to assess the parameters of a computer model of heart-arterial interaction. In particular, total peripheral resistance (R) and aortic leak severity--expressed as leak resistance (R(L,ao))--were quantified for different patient subgroups (group I/IIa/IIb: E(max) = 2.15/0.62/0.47 mm Hg/mL; E(a) = 1.24/0.66/0.90 mm Hg/mL; R = 1.9/0.6/0.85 mm Hg.s/mL, R(L,ao) = 0.35/0.05/0.20 mm Hg.s/mL). A parameter study demonstrated that R(L,ao) was the main determinant of E(a). With all other parameters constant, valve repair would increase E(a) to 2.81, 1.08, and 1.54 mm Hg/mL in groups I, IIa, and IIb, respectively. For a given E(a)/E(max), LV pump efficiency (estimated as the ratio of stroke work and LV systolic pressure-volume area) was lower than the theoretical predicted value, except for the simulations with intact aortic valve.
CONCLUSIONS: In AR, E(a) is determined by aortic leak severity rather than by arterial system properties. Using E(a)/E(max) as a coupling parameter in general or as a mechanico-energetic regulatory parameter in particular is questionable.