Journal of evaluation in clinical practice · 2025
Measurement of Physical Activity Divided Into Inside and Outside the Home in People With Parkinson's Disease: A Feasibility Study.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Hirakawa Yuichi, Sakurai Hiroaki, Takeda Kazuya, Koyama Soichiro, Iwai Masanobu, Motoya Ikuo, Kanada Yoshikiyo, Kawamura Nobutoshi, Kawamura Mami, Tanabe Shigeo
Аннотация
RATIONALE: In people with Parkinson's disease (PD), quantitative assessment of activities inside and outside the home is crucial for planning effective rehabilitation tailored to a person's living conditions and characteristics.
AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: We examined the feasibility of combining a physical activity metre and a daily activity diary for people with PD.
METHODS: Physical activity was evaluated using a triaxial accelerometer and recorded in a daily activity diary by the participant. The feasibility outcome was the data adoption rate, which was the physical activity rate calculated from the activity metre wearing time and the missing times from the daily activity diary.
RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: Of the 10 participants, nine had a complete data set (adoption rate 90%). The mean physical activity metre wearing time was 14.12 ± 2.26 h/day, with a mean missing time of 25.7 ± 18.1 min/day in the daily activity diary. Combining a physical activity metre and a daily activity diary is feasible in people with PD, particularly when planning rehabilitation protocols to enhance daily physical activity.
AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: We examined the feasibility of combining a physical activity metre and a daily activity diary for people with PD.
METHODS: Physical activity was evaluated using a triaxial accelerometer and recorded in a daily activity diary by the participant. The feasibility outcome was the data adoption rate, which was the physical activity rate calculated from the activity metre wearing time and the missing times from the daily activity diary.
RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: Of the 10 participants, nine had a complete data set (adoption rate 90%). The mean physical activity metre wearing time was 14.12 ± 2.26 h/day, with a mean missing time of 25.7 ± 18.1 min/day in the daily activity diary. Combining a physical activity metre and a daily activity diary is feasible in people with PD, particularly when planning rehabilitation protocols to enhance daily physical activity.