The Journal of heart valve disease · 2002
Long-term follow up in patients receiving a small aortic valve prosthesis.
Сравнительное исследованиеОценочное исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Arata Ken-Ichi, Iguro Yoshifumi, Masuda Hiroshi, Kinjo Tamahiro, Matsumoto Hitoshi, Yotsumoto Gouichi, Sakata Ryuzo, Taira Akira
Аннотация
BACKGROUND AND AIMS OF THE STUDY: Concern persists regarding the long-term effects of aortic valve replacement (AVR) in the small aortic root.
METHODS: Twenty-eight patients (21 females, seven males; mean age 54.1+/-11.7 years; mean body surface area (BSA) 1.39+/-0.07 m2) who underwent AVR with a 19 mm mechanical valve more than 10 years previously at the authors' institute, were followed up. Long-term echocardiographic evaluations were performed in 18 of 21 survivors.
RESULTS: Follow up in the 28 patients was complete for up to 19.2 years (mean 11.4 years); cumulative follow up was 318.1 patient-years. Actuarial survival rates at 5, 10 and 15 years were 88.5+/-6.3%, 72.0+/-9.0% and 72.0+/-9.0%, respectively. In general, NYHA class showed satisfactory improvement. Long-term echocardiography showed significant reductions in left ventricular (LV) wall thickness and mass index compared with preoperative values, despite the existence of pressure gradients. A negative correlation was found between the rate of reduction of LV wall thickness and BSA.
CONCLUSION: Implantation of the 19 mm aortic mechanical prosthesis was viable in patients with a small aortic annulus, especially if their BSA was <1.45 m2.
METHODS: Twenty-eight patients (21 females, seven males; mean age 54.1+/-11.7 years; mean body surface area (BSA) 1.39+/-0.07 m2) who underwent AVR with a 19 mm mechanical valve more than 10 years previously at the authors' institute, were followed up. Long-term echocardiographic evaluations were performed in 18 of 21 survivors.
RESULTS: Follow up in the 28 patients was complete for up to 19.2 years (mean 11.4 years); cumulative follow up was 318.1 patient-years. Actuarial survival rates at 5, 10 and 15 years were 88.5+/-6.3%, 72.0+/-9.0% and 72.0+/-9.0%, respectively. In general, NYHA class showed satisfactory improvement. Long-term echocardiography showed significant reductions in left ventricular (LV) wall thickness and mass index compared with preoperative values, despite the existence of pressure gradients. A negative correlation was found between the rate of reduction of LV wall thickness and BSA.
CONCLUSION: Implantation of the 19 mm aortic mechanical prosthesis was viable in patients with a small aortic annulus, especially if their BSA was <1.45 m2.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
AdultAgedAortic ValveAortic Valve InsufficiencyAortic Valve StenosisBody Surface AreaDisease-Free SurvivalEchocardiographyFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHeart SeptumHeart Valve Prosthesis ImplantationHeart VentriclesHumansJapanMaleMiddle AgedPostoperative ComplicationsReproducibility of ResultsTimeTime FactorsTreatment Outcome