Hepatology research : the official journal of the Japan Society of Hepatology · 2019
Liver stiffness does not affect ultrasound-guided attenuation coefficient measurement in the evaluation of hepatic steatosis.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Tada Toshifumi, Kumada Takashi, Toyoda Hidenori, Yasuda Satoshi, Sone Yasuhiro, Hashinokuchi Shinichi, Ogawa Sadanobu, Oguri Takuma, Kamiyama Naohisa, Chuma Makoto, Akita Tomoyuki, Tanaka Junko
Аннотация
AIM: Recently, a new method has been developed to diagnose hepatic steatosis with attenuation coefficients based on the ultrasound-guided attenuation parameter (UGAP). We investigated whether fibrosis identified by hepatic stiffness measurements based on magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) affects attenuation coefficient measurement using UGAP for the evaluation of hepatic steatosis.
METHODS: A total of 608 patients with chronic liver disease were analyzed. Correlations between magnetic resonance imaging-determined proton density fat fraction (PDFF) or MRE value and attenuation coefficients were evaluated. In addition, the interaction between hepatic fibrosis and the attenuation coefficient was analyzed.
RESULTS: The correlation coefficient (r) between PDFF values and attenuation coefficient values was 0.724, indicating a strong relationship. Conversely, the r between MRE values and attenuation coefficient values was -0.187, indicating almost no relationship. In the multiple regression assessment of the effect of PDFF and MRE on the attenuation coefficient based on UGAP, the P-values for PDFF, MRE, and PDFF × MRE were < 0.001, 0.277, and 0.903, respectively. In patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (n = 169), the r between PDFF values and attenuation coefficient values was 0.695, indicating a moderate relationship. Conversely, the r between MRE values and attenuation coefficient values was -0.068, indicating almost no relationship. In the multiple regression assessment of the effect of PDFF and MRE on the attenuation coefficient based on UGAP, the P-values for PDFF, MRE, and PDFF × MRE were <0.001, 0.948, and 0.706, respectively.
CONCLUSION: UGAP-determined attenuation coefficient was weakly affected by liver stiffness, an indicator of hepatic fibrosis.
METHODS: A total of 608 patients with chronic liver disease were analyzed. Correlations between magnetic resonance imaging-determined proton density fat fraction (PDFF) or MRE value and attenuation coefficients were evaluated. In addition, the interaction between hepatic fibrosis and the attenuation coefficient was analyzed.
RESULTS: The correlation coefficient (r) between PDFF values and attenuation coefficient values was 0.724, indicating a strong relationship. Conversely, the r between MRE values and attenuation coefficient values was -0.187, indicating almost no relationship. In the multiple regression assessment of the effect of PDFF and MRE on the attenuation coefficient based on UGAP, the P-values for PDFF, MRE, and PDFF × MRE were < 0.001, 0.277, and 0.903, respectively. In patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (n = 169), the r between PDFF values and attenuation coefficient values was 0.695, indicating a moderate relationship. Conversely, the r between MRE values and attenuation coefficient values was -0.068, indicating almost no relationship. In the multiple regression assessment of the effect of PDFF and MRE on the attenuation coefficient based on UGAP, the P-values for PDFF, MRE, and PDFF × MRE were <0.001, 0.948, and 0.706, respectively.
CONCLUSION: UGAP-determined attenuation coefficient was weakly affected by liver stiffness, an indicator of hepatic fibrosis.