MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/s0003-4975(01)03402-6

Медицинская библиотека · The Annals of thoracic surgery · 2002

Does ministernotomy improve postoperative outcome in aortic valve operation? A prospective randomized study.

Bonacchi Massimo, Prifti Edvin, Giunti Gabriele, Frati Giacomo, Sani Guido

Клиническое исследованиеСравнительное исследованиеОценочное исследованиеСтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеКомментарийПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to compare the postoperative outcome obtained in patients undergoing elective aortic valve operation, either through ministernotomy or conventional sternotomy.

METHODS

Between January 1999 and July 2001, 80 consecutive patients undergoing elective aortic valve replacement were randomly divided into two groups: group I (n = 40 patients) undergoing a ministernotomy approach (reversed-C or reversed-L), and group II (n = 40 patients) undergoing conventional sternotomy.

RESULTS

The length of skin incision was significantly shorter in group I than in group II (8.2+/-1.3 cm versus 23.7+/-2.6 cm, p < 0.001). No significant differences were found in cardiopulmonary bypass duration, associated procedures, or aortic cross-clamping times. Total operating time was 3.7+/-0.46 hours in group I compared with 3.4+/-0.6 hours in group II (p = 0.014). A similar incidence of cardiac, neurologic, infective, and renal complications between groups was found. Mean mediastinal drainage and mean blood transfusions (amount of blood transfused) per patient were greater in group II (p < 0.004 and p < 0.001, respectively). Twenty-five (62.5%) patients in group II and 15 (37.5%) patients in group I required postoperative blood transfusion (p = 0.04). Mechanical ventilation time was significantly longer in group II (6.2+/-1.8 hours versus 4.4+/-0.9 hours, p = 0.006). Five days after the surgical procedure, spirometric data analysis demonstrated a significantly lower total lung capacity and maximum inspiratory and expiratory pressures in group II compared with group I (p = 0.003, p = 0.007, and p < 0.001, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Our results showed that ministernotomy had not only important cosmetic advantages but also beneficial effects in blood loss and transfusion, postoperative pain, and probably in sternal stability. Ministernotomy also improved recovery of respiratory function and allowed earlier extubation and hospital discharge.

Для цитирования: Bonacchi Massimo, Prifti Edvin, Giunti Gabriele, Frati Giacomo, Sani Guido. Does ministernotomy improve postoperative outcome in aortic valve operation? A prospective randomized study.. The Annals of thoracic surgery. 2002. DOI: 10.1016/s0003-4975(01)03402-6.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.