MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.3399/bjgpo.2025.0018

Медицинская библиотека · BJGP open · 2025

Quality indicators for lifestyle or behavioural management for the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease in primary care: a systematic review.

Bam Kiran, Lin Beilei, Olaiya Muideen T, Cadilhac Dominique A, Redfern Julie, Nelson Mark R, Sanders Lauren M, Andrew Nadine E, Sundararajan Vijaya, Murphy Lisa, Kilkenny Monique F

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Monitoring lifestyle or behavioural risk factors using quality indicators is critical for the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease (CVD).

AIM: To summarise indicators for monitoring lifestyle risk factors for the primary prevention of CVD.

DESIGN &

SETTING

A systematic review of quality indicators in primary care.

METHOD: Four research databases (Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid Embase, CINAHL Plus, and Scopus) and grey literature were searched to identify articles (indicator sets) used to monitor lifestyle risk factors. Articles were assessed for methodological quality using the Appraisal of Indicators through Research and Evaluation (AIRE) instrument. Articles with strong methodological quality, scoring ≥50% in each domain (that is, relevance, stakeholder involvement, scientific evidence, and usage) were included. Indicators were categorised into assessment of lifestyle risk factors or advice on healthy lifestyle.

RESULTS

We identified 39/282 (14%) articles including indicators to monitor lifestyle risk factors from a full-text review. Of these, 19 (49%) articles with strong methodological quality, comprising 90 unique indicators, were included. Most of the indicators were on assessing smoking status (21%), body weight (18%), advice on smoking cessation (13%), immunisation (9%), and advice on physical activity (8%). Assessment of alcohol consumption (3%) and healthy eating (2%) were the least reported. When comparing assessment versus advice indicators, we found gaps in monitoring smoking status (41% assessment versus 27% advice) and body weight (35% versus 14%). Notably, there were more indicators for advice on (16%) than assessment of (4%) healthy eating.

CONCLUSION

We identified several indicators for the monitoring of lifestyle risk factors. However, there is a need to ensure an appropriate mix of indicators on assessment versus advice.

Для цитирования: Bam Kiran, Lin Beilei, Olaiya Muideen T, Cadilhac Dominique A, Redfern Julie, Nelson Mark R, Sanders Lauren M, Andrew Nadine E, Sundararajan Vijaya, Murphy Lisa, Kilkenny Monique F. Quality indicators for lifestyle or behavioural management for the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease in primary care: a systematic review.. BJGP open. 2025. DOI: 10.3399/bjgpo.2025.0018.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.