Alimentary pharmacology & therapeutics · 2019
Moderate to severe hepatic steatosis leads to overestimation of liver stiffness measurement in chronic hepatitis B patients without significant fibrosis.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Shen Feng, Mi Yu-Qiang, Xu Liang, Liu Yong-Gang, Wang Xiao-Ying, Pan Qin, Zhang Rui-Nan, Hu Xi-Qi, Xu Lei-Ming, Fan Jian-Gao
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Liver stiffness measurement (LSM) by transient elastography is a noninvasive method for the diagnosis of hepatic fibrosis. The impact of hepatic steatosis on LSM remains to be explored.
AIM: To determine whether LSM is affected by hepatic steatosis in patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB).
METHODS: Consecutive patients with biopsy-proven CHB were prospectively enrolled. Hepatic steatosis was classified by pathology as none (S0, <5%), mild (S1, 5%-33%), and moderate-severe (S2-3, >33%), and quantitatively by controlled attenuation parameter (CAP) as CAP S0 (≤247 dB/m), CAP S1 (248-267 dB/m) and CAP S2-3 (≥268 dB/m). Liver fibrosis was assessed by METAVIR classification and noninvasively by LSM.
RESULTS: The prevalence of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (n = 223) in CHB patients (n = 593) was 37.6%. Forty-eight belonged to S2-3 and 127 belonged to CAP S2-3. In patients without significant fibrosis (F0-1), the median LSM (kPa) was 7.4 in S2-3 and 7.1 in CAP S2-3, which was significantly higher than that in S0/S1 (P = 0.005) and CAP S0/S1 (P = 0.003). No significant difference was found in significant fibrosis (F2-4). For LSM identifying significant fibrosis (F2-4), the negative predictive value was higher in CHB patients with CAP ≥ 268 compared to those with CAP < 268 (0.81 vs 0.73); the positive predictive value was lower in CAP ≥ 268 than its counterpart (0.65 vs 0.76).
CONCLUSIONS: Moderate-severe steatosis increased the LSM value in CHB patients without significant fibrosis. A CAP ≥ 268 did not affect LSM for ruling out, but it slightly affected LSM for ruling in significant fibrosis.
TRIAL REGISTRATION: ChiCTR-DDT-13003983.
AIM: To determine whether LSM is affected by hepatic steatosis in patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB).
METHODS: Consecutive patients with biopsy-proven CHB were prospectively enrolled. Hepatic steatosis was classified by pathology as none (S0, <5%), mild (S1, 5%-33%), and moderate-severe (S2-3, >33%), and quantitatively by controlled attenuation parameter (CAP) as CAP S0 (≤247 dB/m), CAP S1 (248-267 dB/m) and CAP S2-3 (≥268 dB/m). Liver fibrosis was assessed by METAVIR classification and noninvasively by LSM.
RESULTS: The prevalence of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (n = 223) in CHB patients (n = 593) was 37.6%. Forty-eight belonged to S2-3 and 127 belonged to CAP S2-3. In patients without significant fibrosis (F0-1), the median LSM (kPa) was 7.4 in S2-3 and 7.1 in CAP S2-3, which was significantly higher than that in S0/S1 (P = 0.005) and CAP S0/S1 (P = 0.003). No significant difference was found in significant fibrosis (F2-4). For LSM identifying significant fibrosis (F2-4), the negative predictive value was higher in CHB patients with CAP ≥ 268 compared to those with CAP < 268 (0.81 vs 0.73); the positive predictive value was lower in CAP ≥ 268 than its counterpart (0.65 vs 0.76).
CONCLUSIONS: Moderate-severe steatosis increased the LSM value in CHB patients without significant fibrosis. A CAP ≥ 268 did not affect LSM for ruling out, but it slightly affected LSM for ruling in significant fibrosis.
TRIAL REGISTRATION: ChiCTR-DDT-13003983.