Heart rhythm · 2019
Automated intraprocedural localization of origin of ventricular activation using patient-specific computed tomographic imaging.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Zhou Shijie, Sapp John L, Horáček B Milan, Warren James W, MacInnis Paul J, Davis Jason, Elsokkari Ihab, Choudhury Rajin, Parkash Ratika, Gray Chris, Gardner Martin, MacIntyre Ciorsti J, AbdelWahab Amir
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: To facilitate catheter ablation of ventricular tachycardia (VT), we previously developed an automated method to identify sources of left ventricular (LV) activation in real time using 12-lead electrocardiography (ECG), the accuracy of which depends on acquisition of a complete electroanatomic (EA) map.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to assess the feasibility of using a registered cardiac computed tomogram (CT) rather than an EA map to permit real-time localization and avoid errors introduced by incomplete maps.
METHODS: Before LV VT ablation, 10 patients underwent CT imaging and 3-dimensional reconstruction of the cardiac surface to create a triangle mesh surface, which was registered to the EA map during the procedure and imported into custom localization software. The software uses QRS integrals from leads III, V2, and V6; derives personalized regression coefficients from pacing at ≥5 sites with known locations; and estimates the location of unknown activation sites on the 3-dimensional patient-specific LV endocardial surface. Localization accuracy was quantified for VT exit sites in millimeters by comparing the calculated against the known locations.
RESULTS: The VT exit site was identified for 20 VTs using activation and entrainment mapping, supplemented by pace-mapping at the scar margin. The automated localization software achieved incremental accuracy with additional pacing sites and had a mean localization error of 6.9 ± 5.7 mm for the 20 VTs.
CONCLUSION: Patient-specific CT geometry is feasible for use in real-time automated localization of ventricular activation and may avoid reliance on a complete EA map.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to assess the feasibility of using a registered cardiac computed tomogram (CT) rather than an EA map to permit real-time localization and avoid errors introduced by incomplete maps.
METHODS: Before LV VT ablation, 10 patients underwent CT imaging and 3-dimensional reconstruction of the cardiac surface to create a triangle mesh surface, which was registered to the EA map during the procedure and imported into custom localization software. The software uses QRS integrals from leads III, V2, and V6; derives personalized regression coefficients from pacing at ≥5 sites with known locations; and estimates the location of unknown activation sites on the 3-dimensional patient-specific LV endocardial surface. Localization accuracy was quantified for VT exit sites in millimeters by comparing the calculated against the known locations.
RESULTS: The VT exit site was identified for 20 VTs using activation and entrainment mapping, supplemented by pace-mapping at the scar margin. The automated localization software achieved incremental accuracy with additional pacing sites and had a mean localization error of 6.9 ± 5.7 mm for the 20 VTs.
CONCLUSION: Patient-specific CT geometry is feasible for use in real-time automated localization of ventricular activation and may avoid reliance on a complete EA map.