Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology · 2019
Bipolar radiofrequency ablation creates different lesion characteristics compared to simultaneous unipolar ablation.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Nguyen Duy T, Zheng Lijun, Zipse Matthew M, Borne Ryan T, Tzou Wendy S, Fleeman Blake, Sauer William H
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: Both bipolar and simultaneous radiofrequency ablation (bRFA, simRFA) have been used to treat thick midmyocardial substrate as well as during circular, multipolar ablation between shorter distances.
OBJECTIVES: We sought to evaluate the biophysical parameters of simRFA, sequential unipolar RFA (seqRFA), and bRFA.
METHODS: Bovine myocardium was placed in a circulating saline bath. To simulate thick substrate conditions, two open irrigated ablation catheters were oriented across from each other, with myocardium in between. Thermocouples were placed in the center, ±2 mm, of the myocardium. Unipolar ablations were performed sequentially or simultaneously at 50 W for 60 seconds and compared to bRFA using the same settings. In addition, to simulate multipolar ablation, two open irrigated ablation catheters were oriented on the same side and perpendicular to myocardium at 1, 2, and 4 mm spacing. SimRFA were performed at 15 and 25 W for 60 seconds and compared to bRFA.
RESULTS: For thicker tissue, simRFA produced similar lesion volume and depth compared to bRFA but with a lesion geometry similar to seqRFA. Unlike seqRFA and simRFA, bRFA had a necrotic core spanning the myocardium. Core depths, volumes, and temperatures were significantly greater for bRFA lesions compared to simRFA or seqRFA (Figure, P < .001). Similar results were consistent for bRFA and simRFA at shorter spacings.
CONCLUSIONS: BRFA has greater core lesion temperatures, corresponding to a denser and larger necrotic core, than either simRFA or seqRFA. This may have implications for considering the optimal strategy for deep midmyocardial substrates or during multipolar ablation.
OBJECTIVES: We sought to evaluate the biophysical parameters of simRFA, sequential unipolar RFA (seqRFA), and bRFA.
METHODS: Bovine myocardium was placed in a circulating saline bath. To simulate thick substrate conditions, two open irrigated ablation catheters were oriented across from each other, with myocardium in between. Thermocouples were placed in the center, ±2 mm, of the myocardium. Unipolar ablations were performed sequentially or simultaneously at 50 W for 60 seconds and compared to bRFA using the same settings. In addition, to simulate multipolar ablation, two open irrigated ablation catheters were oriented on the same side and perpendicular to myocardium at 1, 2, and 4 mm spacing. SimRFA were performed at 15 and 25 W for 60 seconds and compared to bRFA.
RESULTS: For thicker tissue, simRFA produced similar lesion volume and depth compared to bRFA but with a lesion geometry similar to seqRFA. Unlike seqRFA and simRFA, bRFA had a necrotic core spanning the myocardium. Core depths, volumes, and temperatures were significantly greater for bRFA lesions compared to simRFA or seqRFA (Figure, P < .001). Similar results were consistent for bRFA and simRFA at shorter spacings.
CONCLUSIONS: BRFA has greater core lesion temperatures, corresponding to a denser and larger necrotic core, than either simRFA or seqRFA. This may have implications for considering the optimal strategy for deep midmyocardial substrates or during multipolar ablation.