MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.4103/jcde.jcde_506_24

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of conservative dentistry and endodontics · 2024

Root caries: Prevalence, risk indicators, and clinical characteristics - A cross-sectional study.

Shetty Jyothi, Hegde Mithra N, D'Souza Neevan

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

OBJECTIVES

The objectives of this study were to determine the prevalence of root caries (RC) in South Coastal population of India, to identify the risk indicators associated with it and to describe some clinical characteristics of RC lesions.

MATERIALS AND

METHODS

A cross-sectional study was conducted with a sample size of 1062 subjects to assess the prevalence of RC. Each subject underwent an oral examination, performed by a single-calibrated examiner. Questionnaires were used to collect the data on oral hygiene habits, diet, smoking, alcohol habits, systemic conditions, and education level. Univariate and multivariable regression analyses were performed to identify the risk indicators associated with RC.

RESULTS

The prevalence of RC was found to be 7.5%, with a mean RC Index of 17.66%. The results of multiple logistic regression showed that age (≥40 years), systemic conditions, and exposed root surfaces were statistically significantly associated with RC (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

RC is prevalent not only in the older age group but also the younger adults in this cohort. This study suggests an association between RC and the variables age (≥40 years), exposed root surfaces and systemic conditions.

Для цитирования: Shetty Jyothi, Hegde Mithra N, D'Souza Neevan. Root caries: Prevalence, risk indicators, and clinical characteristics - A cross-sectional study.. Journal of conservative dentistry and endodontics. 2024. DOI: 10.4103/jcde.jcde_506_24.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.