MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1136/gut.35.2.191

Медицинская библиотека · Gut · 1994

A database on dyspepsia.

Crean G P, Holden R J, Knill-Jones R P, Beattie A D, James W B, Marjoribanks F M, Spiegelhalter D J

СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

A prospective study of dyspepsia was carried out in a primary referral hospital between 1974-1987 including 1540 patients of whom 1433 were seen as outpatients. The study protocol was agreed in advance and a structured questionnaire was used to elicit relevant clinical information: up to three diagnoses were permitted for each patient. The commonest principal diagnoses were duodenal ulcer (26%), functional dyspepsia (22%), and irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) (15%); alcohol related dyspepsia (4%) was as common as gastric carcinoma or symptomatic gall stones. Multiple diagnoses were common (31% given two diagnoses, and 6% given three) so that in all 2111 diagnoses were given to 1540 patients; the functional disorders (IBS and functional dyspepsia) considered together accounted for 39% of all diagnoses made. Whereas organic conditions were diagnosed by clinicians with confidence (63-98% considered 'certain'), even when given as the principal or first diagnosis IBS was considered 'certain' in only 61% and functional dyspepsia 48%. The demographic symptom data, together with information on tobacco and alcohol use, and work lost are described in detail.

Для цитирования: Crean G P, Holden R J, Knill-Jones R P, Beattie A D, James W B, Marjoribanks F M, Spiegelhalter D J. A database on dyspepsia.. Gut. 1994. DOI: 10.1136/gut.35.2.191.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.