Indian journal of ophthalmology · 2025
Comparative analysis of two innovative products designed exclusively for sutureless scleral fixation of intraocular lenses, "XNIT device" versus "CM-T flex intraocular lens".
СтатьяСравнительное исследованиеМногоцентровое исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Baskaran Prabu, Madhivanan Nivean, Sahu Juhi, Mahalingam Maanasi, Prabu Seema, DNivean Pratheeba, Abrar Mohamed
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To compare the safety and efficacy of two innovative products for sutureless scleral fixation of intraocular lenses (SFIOL), namely, extraocular needle-guided haptic insertion technique (XNIT) device and CM-T Flex IOL.
SETTING: This study was conducted at two different tertiary eye hospitals in South India.
DESIGN: Nonrandomized comparative-retrospective study.
METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 137 eyes of 137 patients was done, in which 80 eyes underwent SFIOL using XNIT technique and 57 eyes used the CM-T flex IOL. Visual outcomes and complication rates were evaluated over a 6-month follow-up period.
RESULTS: At 6 months, the XNIT group demonstrated superior median best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA). Both techniques showed comparable BCVA at 1 and 3 months follow-up visits. XNIT group showed better uncorrected visual acuity at all study visits. There were no statistically significant differences between two techniques in postoperative complication rates.
CONCLUSION: In conclusion, both XNIT and CM-T Flex techniques represent advancements in SFIOL surgery, each with distinct advantages. Clinicians should consider patient-specific factors and surgical preferences when choosing between these techniques for optimal outcomes in aphakic management.
SETTING: This study was conducted at two different tertiary eye hospitals in South India.
DESIGN: Nonrandomized comparative-retrospective study.
METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 137 eyes of 137 patients was done, in which 80 eyes underwent SFIOL using XNIT technique and 57 eyes used the CM-T flex IOL. Visual outcomes and complication rates were evaluated over a 6-month follow-up period.
RESULTS: At 6 months, the XNIT group demonstrated superior median best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA). Both techniques showed comparable BCVA at 1 and 3 months follow-up visits. XNIT group showed better uncorrected visual acuity at all study visits. There were no statistically significant differences between two techniques in postoperative complication rates.
CONCLUSION: In conclusion, both XNIT and CM-T Flex techniques represent advancements in SFIOL surgery, each with distinct advantages. Clinicians should consider patient-specific factors and surgical preferences when choosing between these techniques for optimal outcomes in aphakic management.