Langenbeck's archives of surgery · 2026
Robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy in patients with hepatic arterial variants: surgical outcomes and technical considerations in a single-center cohort.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Imamura Hajime, Adachi Tomohiko, Hamada Takashi, Migita Kazushige, Satoh Ayaka, Kurotaki Kouki, Nakamura Shun, Ogawa Shinichiro, Askeyev Baglan, Matsushima Hajime, Kinoshita Ayaka, Soyama Akihiko, Eguchi Susumu
Аннотация
PURPOSE: Hepatic arterial anomalies are commonly encountered during pancreaticoduodenectomy. However, their impact on perioperative outcomes in robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy (RPD) remains unclear.
METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 79 consecutive patients who underwent RPD. Hepatic arterial anatomy was classified according to the systems of Michels and Hiatt. Perioperative outcomes were compared between patients with hepatic arterial variants and those with normal anatomy.
RESULTS: Hepatic arterial anomalies were identified in 22 patients (27.8%). According to Hiatt's classification, 57 patients (72.2%) had normal type I anatomy, while type II and III variants were observed in 4 (5.1%) and 9 (11.4%) patients, respectively. Two patients exhibited type IV variants with both replaced right and left hepatic arteries. Data are presented in the order of absence and presence of arterial anomalies. Median age was similar (72 vs. 73 years, P = 0.86), with no difference in sex distribution (P = 0.25). Operative time (549 vs. 586 min, P = 0.92), blood loss (73 vs. 50 mL, P = 0.49), rates of clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula (5.3% vs. 4.5%, P = 0.69), postoperative bleeding(0% vs. 4.5%, P = 0.27), pseudoaneurysm hemorrhage (5.3% vs. 0%, P = 0.55), and major complications (Clavien-Dindo grade ≥ 3a) (8.8% vs. 9.0%, P = 0.63) did not differ significantly.
CONCLUSION: The presence of hepatic arterial anomalies did not adversely affect perioperative outcomes in patients undergoing RPD. These findings suggest that, with appropriate preoperative planning and meticulous surgical technique, RPD can be performed safely in selected patients with hepatic arterial variants at experienced centers.
METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 79 consecutive patients who underwent RPD. Hepatic arterial anatomy was classified according to the systems of Michels and Hiatt. Perioperative outcomes were compared between patients with hepatic arterial variants and those with normal anatomy.
RESULTS: Hepatic arterial anomalies were identified in 22 patients (27.8%). According to Hiatt's classification, 57 patients (72.2%) had normal type I anatomy, while type II and III variants were observed in 4 (5.1%) and 9 (11.4%) patients, respectively. Two patients exhibited type IV variants with both replaced right and left hepatic arteries. Data are presented in the order of absence and presence of arterial anomalies. Median age was similar (72 vs. 73 years, P = 0.86), with no difference in sex distribution (P = 0.25). Operative time (549 vs. 586 min, P = 0.92), blood loss (73 vs. 50 mL, P = 0.49), rates of clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula (5.3% vs. 4.5%, P = 0.69), postoperative bleeding(0% vs. 4.5%, P = 0.27), pseudoaneurysm hemorrhage (5.3% vs. 0%, P = 0.55), and major complications (Clavien-Dindo grade ≥ 3a) (8.8% vs. 9.0%, P = 0.63) did not differ significantly.
CONCLUSION: The presence of hepatic arterial anomalies did not adversely affect perioperative outcomes in patients undergoing RPD. These findings suggest that, with appropriate preoperative planning and meticulous surgical technique, RPD can be performed safely in selected patients with hepatic arterial variants at experienced centers.