Journal of occupational and environmental medicine · 2026
Prevalence and Factors Associated with Metabolic Syndrome Among Heavy Industry Workers: A Cross-Sectional Study.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Özdemir Petek Meryem, Karabudak Efsun
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: This study evaluated the prevalence of metabolic syndrome (MetS) among heavy industry workers and its impact on nutritional status.
METHODS: This cross-sectional study included 257 male (19-55 years) volunteers. Anthropometric, biochemical,blood pressure measurements were also assessed. Dietary intake was assessed using 24-hour recall, and MetS was diagnosed using the NCEP-ATP III criteria.
RESULTS: The prevalence of MetS was 21.4%. In workers with MetS, age, BMI, and energy expenditure were significantly higher (p<0.05). Obesity and abdominal obesity were associated with 3.06-3.42-fold higher odds of MetS. Workers' intake of certain macronutrients and anthropometric measurements explained 25.2% of the variance in MetS.
CONCLUSION: In addition to energy intake, dietary patterns and their cumulative effects on body composition are primary determinants of MetS. Dietitian support and regular screenings are important to prevent indirect workforce losses.
METHODS: This cross-sectional study included 257 male (19-55 years) volunteers. Anthropometric, biochemical,blood pressure measurements were also assessed. Dietary intake was assessed using 24-hour recall, and MetS was diagnosed using the NCEP-ATP III criteria.
RESULTS: The prevalence of MetS was 21.4%. In workers with MetS, age, BMI, and energy expenditure were significantly higher (p<0.05). Obesity and abdominal obesity were associated with 3.06-3.42-fold higher odds of MetS. Workers' intake of certain macronutrients and anthropometric measurements explained 25.2% of the variance in MetS.
CONCLUSION: In addition to energy intake, dietary patterns and their cumulative effects on body composition are primary determinants of MetS. Dietitian support and regular screenings are important to prevent indirect workforce losses.