MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.nurt.2008.07.003

Медицинская библиотека · Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2008

Therapeutic strategies in congenital myasthenic syndromes.

Schara Ulrike, Lochmüller Hanns

СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАОбзорПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

Congenital myasthenic syndromes (CMS) are classified in terms of the located defect: presynaptic, postsynaptic, and synaptic. They are inherited disorders caused by various genetic defects, all but the slow-channel CMS by recessive inheritance. To date, 10 different CMS are known and further CMS subtypes and their genetic cause may be disclosed by future investigations. Prognosis in CMS is variable and largely depends on the pathophysiological and genetic defect. Subtypes showing progression and life-threatening crises with apneas are generally less favorable than others. Therapeutic agents used in CMS depend on the underlying defect and include acetylcholinesterase inhibitor, 3,4-diaminopyridine, quinidine sulfate, fluoxetine, acetazolamide, and ephedrine. Although there are no double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trials for CMS, several drugs have shown convincingly positive clinical effects. It is therefore necessary to start a rational therapy regime as early as possible. In most CMS, however, mild and severe clinical courses are reported, which makes assessment on an individual basis necessary. This review emphasizes therapeutic strategies in CMS.

Для цитирования: Schara Ulrike, Lochmüller Hanns. Therapeutic strategies in congenital myasthenic syndromes.. Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics. 2008. DOI: 10.1016/j.nurt.2008.07.003.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.