Scandinavian journal of gastroenterology · 1998
IgA- and IgG-class antihuman umbilical cord antibody tests in adult coeliac disease.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Sulkanen S, Collin P, Laurila K, Mäki M
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: An antiendomysium antibody test using human umbilical cord as antigen has recently been introduced.
METHODS: We determined IgA- and IgG-class antihuman umbilical cord (HUC-ab), antireticulin (ARA), and antigliadin antibodies (AGA) in 92 untreated adult coeliac patients, in 95 non-coeliac subjects, and in 4 coeliac patients with selective IgA deficiency. Tissue antibodies were measured with an indirect immunofluorescence method and AGA with an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay.
RESULTS: Of adult coeliac patients 85% were positive for IgA-class HUC-ab, 78% were positive for ARA, and 80% for AGA; the specificity for HUC-ab and ARA was 100%, and for AGA 86%. Combination of HUC-ab, ARA, and high-titre AGA increased the sensitivity to 96% without loss of specificity. IgG-class HUC-ab was positive in 12% of coeliac patients, in all four coeliac patients with IgA deficiency, and in none of the controls.
CONCLUSIONS: The HUC-ab test is highly specific but not 100% sensitive for detecting adult coeliac disease. A combination of the IgA-class HUC-ab, ARA, and high-titre AGA tests is recommended. In selective IgA deficiency the IgG-class HUC-ab test seems to work well.
METHODS: We determined IgA- and IgG-class antihuman umbilical cord (HUC-ab), antireticulin (ARA), and antigliadin antibodies (AGA) in 92 untreated adult coeliac patients, in 95 non-coeliac subjects, and in 4 coeliac patients with selective IgA deficiency. Tissue antibodies were measured with an indirect immunofluorescence method and AGA with an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay.
RESULTS: Of adult coeliac patients 85% were positive for IgA-class HUC-ab, 78% were positive for ARA, and 80% for AGA; the specificity for HUC-ab and ARA was 100%, and for AGA 86%. Combination of HUC-ab, ARA, and high-titre AGA increased the sensitivity to 96% without loss of specificity. IgG-class HUC-ab was positive in 12% of coeliac patients, in all four coeliac patients with IgA deficiency, and in none of the controls.
CONCLUSIONS: The HUC-ab test is highly specific but not 100% sensitive for detecting adult coeliac disease. A combination of the IgA-class HUC-ab, ARA, and high-titre AGA tests is recommended. In selective IgA deficiency the IgG-class HUC-ab test seems to work well.