Vascular and endovascular surgery · 2014
Integration of endovascular therapy of ruptured abdominal and iliac aneurysms in the treatment algorithm: a single-center experience in a medium-volume vascular center.
Сравнительное исследованиеОценочное исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Raupach Jan, Dobes Daniel, Lojik Miroslav, Chovanec Vendelin, Ferko Alexander, Gunka Igor, Maly Radovan, Vojacek Jan, Havel Eduard, Lesko Michal, Renc Ondrej, Hoffmann Petr, Ryska Pavel, Krajina Antonin
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To evaluate the influence of endovascular therapy of ruptured abdominal or iliac aneurysms on total mortality.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We analyzed the mortality of 40 patients from 2005 to 2009, when only surgical treatment was available. These results were compared with the period 2010 to 2013, when endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) was assessed as the first option in selected patients.
RESULTS: During 2005 to 2009, the mortality was 37.5%. From 2010 to 2013, 45 patients were treated with mortality 28.9%. Open repair was performed in 35 (77.8%) patients and EVAR in 10 (22.2%) patients. The 30-day and 1-year mortality rates of the EVAR group were 0% and 20%, respectively, and the total mortality rate was 30% during follow-up (median 11 months, range 1-42 months). The 30-day mortality in the surgical group remained unchanged, at 37.1%, and 1-year and total mortality rates were 45.7% and 51.4%, respectively.
CONCLUSION: Following integration in the treatment algorithm, EVAR decreased total mortality in our center by 8.6%.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We analyzed the mortality of 40 patients from 2005 to 2009, when only surgical treatment was available. These results were compared with the period 2010 to 2013, when endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) was assessed as the first option in selected patients.
RESULTS: During 2005 to 2009, the mortality was 37.5%. From 2010 to 2013, 45 patients were treated with mortality 28.9%. Open repair was performed in 35 (77.8%) patients and EVAR in 10 (22.2%) patients. The 30-day and 1-year mortality rates of the EVAR group were 0% and 20%, respectively, and the total mortality rate was 30% during follow-up (median 11 months, range 1-42 months). The 30-day mortality in the surgical group remained unchanged, at 37.1%, and 1-year and total mortality rates were 45.7% and 51.4%, respectively.
CONCLUSION: Following integration in the treatment algorithm, EVAR decreased total mortality in our center by 8.6%.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
AgedAged, 80 and overAlgorithmsAneurysm, RupturedAortic Aneurysm, AbdominalAortic RuptureAortographyBlood Vessel ProsthesisBlood Vessel Prosthesis ImplantationCritical PathwaysCzech RepublicDelivery of Health Care, IntegratedEndovascular ProceduresFeasibility StudiesFemaleHospitals, UniversityHumansIliac AneurysmMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsStentsTime FactorsTomography, X-Ray ComputedTreatment Outcome