Journal of vascular surgery · 2014
Computed tomography evaluation of aortic remodeling after endovascular treatment for complicated ulcer-like projection in patients with type B aortic intramural hematoma.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Sueyoshi Eijun, Nagayama Hiroki, Hashizume Koji, Eishi Kiyoyuki, Sakamoto Ichiro, Uetani Masataka
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: The purpose was to investigate changes of the affected aorta after endovascular treatment for complicated ulcer-like projection (ULP), including aneurysmal change or rupture of ULP, or both, in patients with type B aortic intramural hematoma (IMH).
METHODS: The study evaluated 18 patients (nine men) undergoing thoracic endovascular aortic repair for progressive aneurysmal formation of ULP (n = 17), rupture of ULP (n = 5), or both. Patients were a median age of 72 years (range, 45-83 years). Regular follow-up computed tomography studies were performed after treatment (mean follow-up, 61.2 months). A workstation was used to calculate changes on computed tomography images in the size or volume of ULP, affected aorta, and IMH. The growth rate of the volume of the affected aorta and IMH was also calculated before and after treatment. We evaluated the data using the paired t-test.
RESULTS: A stent graft was successfully deployed and ULPs disappeared in all patients. IMH disappeared in 16 or decreased in two after treatment. There were significant differences in the mean maximum aortic diameter (37.8 ± 5.2 vs 34.5 ± 5.2 mm; P = .0006), mean IMH volume (39.4 ± 12.1 vs 2.0 ± 6.0 mL; P < .0001), and total volume of the aorta with IMH (158.1 ± 40.2 vs 128.9 ± 28.0 mL; P < .0001) before and after treatment.
CONCLUSIONS: Endovascular treatment is a useful treatment for complicated ULP in patients with IMH. Endovascular treatment also contributes to ideal remodeling of the affected aorta.
METHODS: The study evaluated 18 patients (nine men) undergoing thoracic endovascular aortic repair for progressive aneurysmal formation of ULP (n = 17), rupture of ULP (n = 5), or both. Patients were a median age of 72 years (range, 45-83 years). Regular follow-up computed tomography studies were performed after treatment (mean follow-up, 61.2 months). A workstation was used to calculate changes on computed tomography images in the size or volume of ULP, affected aorta, and IMH. The growth rate of the volume of the affected aorta and IMH was also calculated before and after treatment. We evaluated the data using the paired t-test.
RESULTS: A stent graft was successfully deployed and ULPs disappeared in all patients. IMH disappeared in 16 or decreased in two after treatment. There were significant differences in the mean maximum aortic diameter (37.8 ± 5.2 vs 34.5 ± 5.2 mm; P = .0006), mean IMH volume (39.4 ± 12.1 vs 2.0 ± 6.0 mL; P < .0001), and total volume of the aorta with IMH (158.1 ± 40.2 vs 128.9 ± 28.0 mL; P < .0001) before and after treatment.
CONCLUSIONS: Endovascular treatment is a useful treatment for complicated ULP in patients with IMH. Endovascular treatment also contributes to ideal remodeling of the affected aorta.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
AgedAged, 80 and overAorta, ThoracicAortic Aneurysm, ThoracicAortic RuptureAortographyBlood Vessel ProsthesisBlood Vessel Prosthesis ImplantationEndovascular ProceduresFemaleHematomaHumansMaleMiddle AgedPredictive Value of TestsRadiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-AssistedRetrospective StudiesStentsTime FactorsTomography, X-Ray ComputedTreatment OutcomeUlcer